78

Points
Samsung Exynos 1080

78

Points
Google Tensor
Overview - Exynos 1080 Vs Tensor

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 1080 vs Tensor SoCs by Samsung and Google respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 1080 34
Tensor 36
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 1080 31
Tensor 34
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 1080 82
Tensor 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 1080 49
Tensor 51
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 1080 Tensor
CPU 178651 181161
GPU 251983 294446
Memory 127596 103174
UX 138654 145388
Total score 696884 724169
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 1080

  • Exynos 1080 has latest instruction set, hence better than Tensor.

Pros of Google Tensor

  • Tensor has 6.00% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 1080 (848 vs 800 MHz).
  • Tensor has 16.36% higher memory frequency than Exynos 1080 (3200 vs 2750 MHz).
  • Tensor has 3.92% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 1080 (724 K vs 697 K ).
  • Tensor Support 16.36% higher memory bandwidth than Exynos 1080 (51.2 vs 44 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1080 833
Tensor 1026

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1080 2890
Tensor 2879

Image compression

icon
Exynos 1080 135.1
Tensor

Face detection

icon
Exynos 1080 30
Tensor

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 1080 53.1
Tensor

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 1080 51.7
Tensor

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 1080 26.5
Tensor

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 1080 3.53
Tensor

SQLite

icon
Exynos 1080 875.8
Tensor

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability 56%

Graphics test 37 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display WQHD+ @90Hz, FHD+ @144Hz 4k, FHD+ @ 60 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ HDR
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A78
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
    2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 3 MB
  • L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
  • Process 5 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 9 W 5.6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G78 MP10 Mali-G78 MP20
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall
  • GPU frequency 800 MHz 848 MHz
  • Execution units 10 20
  • Shading units 160 320
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2750 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 44 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Neural Processor Tensor Processing Unit
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Exynos 5300g
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 1080

CPU
34%
GPU
31%
Memory
32%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

Google Tensor

CPU
36%
GPU
34%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote