78

Points
Samsung Exynos 1080

78

Points
HiSilicon Kirin 9010
Overview - Exynos 1080 Vs Kirin 9010

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 1080 vs Kirin 9010 SoCs by Samsung and respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 12-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 1080 34
Kirin 9010 55
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 1080 31
Kirin 9010 38
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 1080 82
Kirin 9010 75
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 1080 49
Kirin 9010 56
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 1080 Kirin 9010
CPU 178651 305156
GPU 251983 197179
Memory 127596 266091
UX 138654 201408
Total score 696884 969834
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 1080

  • Exynos 1080 has 21.74% higher CPU clock speed than Kirin 9010 (2800 vs 2300 MHz).
  • Exynos 1080 has 6.67% higher GPU clock speed than Kirin 9010 (800 vs 750 MHz).
  • Exynos 1080 has 28.57% smaller sized transistor than Kirin 9010 (5 vs 7 nm).
  • Exynos 1080 has latest instruction set, hence better than Kirin 9010.

Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9010

  • Kirin 9010 has 39.17% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 1080 (970 K vs 697 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1080 833
Kirin 9010 1442

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1080 2890
Kirin 9010 4471

Image compression

icon
Exynos 1080 135.1
Kirin 9010

Face detection

icon
Exynos 1080 30
Kirin 9010

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 1080 53.1
Kirin 9010

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 1080 51.7
Kirin 9010

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 1080 26.5
Kirin 9010

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 1080 3.53
Kirin 9010

SQLite

icon
Exynos 1080 875.8
Kirin 9010

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display WQHD+ @90Hz, FHD+ @144Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

61%
Turbo Clock Speed

2300 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

70%
Base Frequency

1550 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A78
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.3 GHz – TaiShan V121
    4x 1.55 GHz – TaiShan V121
    6x 2.18 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 12
  • Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 5 nm 7 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 9 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G78 MP10 Maleoon 910
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Maleoon
  • GPU frequency 800 MHz 750 MHz
  • Execution units 10 -
  • Shading units 160 -
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2750 MHz 2750 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 44 Gbit/s 44 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Neural Processor Da Vinci
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Balong 5000
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 1080

CPU
34%
GPU
31%
Memory
32%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

HiSilicon Kirin 9010

CPU
55%
GPU
38%
Memory
32%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote