Menu

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 1280

Exynos 1280

78

Points
Apple A14 Bionic

A14 Bionic
Overview - Exynos 1280 Vs A14 Bionic

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 1280 vs A14 Bionic SoCs by Samsung and Apple respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 1280 24
A14 Bionic 50
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 1280 18
A14 Bionic 48
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 1280 82
A14 Bionic 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 1280 41
A14 Bionic 60
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 1280 A14 Bionic
CPU 121972 203493
GPU 104889 284242
Memory 77341 131989
UX 106223 131211
Total score 410425 750935
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences

Pros of Apple A14 Bionic

  • A14 Bionic has 29.17% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 1280 (3100 vs 2400 MHz).
  • A14 Bionic has 82.97% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 1280 (751 K vs 410 K ).
  • A14 Bionic has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 1280.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1280 733
A14 Bionic 1611

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1280 1832
A14 Bionic 4209

Image compression

icon
Exynos 1280 116.6
A14 Bionic 171.5

Face detection

icon
Exynos 1280 13.5
A14 Bionic 33.6

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 1280 33.1
A14 Bionic 94.8

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 1280 29.3
A14 Bionic 93.1

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 1280 13.1
A14 Bionic 38.7

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 1280 1.97
A14 Bionic 4.5

SQLite

icon
Exynos 1280 556.4
A14 Bionic 1060

3DMark

12%
Exynos 1280
Stability 99%

Graphics test 13 FPS
43%
A14 Bionic
Stability 77%

Graphics test 50 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @120 Hz Full HD+ (2.7K) @ 60Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2732 x 2048
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

82%
Turbo Clock Speed

3100 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     2x 3.1 GHz – Firestorm
    4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm
  • Cores 8 6
  • Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8.5-A
  • L1 cache - 128 KB
  • L2 cache - 8 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 5 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count - 11.8 Billion
  • TDP - 6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G68 MP4 Apple A14 GPU
  • Architecture Valhall 2 -
  • GPU frequency 1000 MHz -
  • Execution units 4 4
  • Shading units 48 -
  • FLOPS - 998 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2. -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 34.1 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 6 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Neural Engine
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 NVMe
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2732 x 2048
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 1280

Samsung Exynos 1280
CPU
24%
GPU
18%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

Apple A14 Bionic

Apple A14 Bionic
CPU
50%
GPU
48%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote