Overview - Exynos 1280 Vs Dimensity 7030

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 1280 vs Dimensity 7030 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 1280 24
Dimensity 7030 33
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 1280 18
Dimensity 7030 21
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 1280 82
Dimensity 7030 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 1280 41
Dimensity 7030 44
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 1280 Dimensity 7030
CPU 121972 163674
GPU 104889 81587
Memory 77341 121193
UX 106223 151408
Total score 410425 517862
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 1280

  • Exynos 1280 has 16.67% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 7030 (5 vs 6 nm).
  • Exynos 1280 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 7030.

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7030

  • Dimensity 7030 has 4.17% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 1280 (2500 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7030 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Exynos 1280 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7030 has 26.18% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 1280 (518 K vs 410 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1280 733
Dimensity 7030 1036

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1280 1832
Dimensity 7030 2440

Image compression

icon
Exynos 1280 116.6
Dimensity 7030

Face detection

icon
Exynos 1280 13.5
Dimensity 7030

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 1280 33.1
Dimensity 7030

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 1280 29.3
Dimensity 7030

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 1280 13.1
Dimensity 7030

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 1280 1.97
Dimensity 7030

SQLite

icon
Exynos 1280 556.4
Dimensity 7030

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 13 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @120 Hz FHD+@144Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR10+ Adaptive, HLG and Dolby Vision
  • Color Depth - 10-bit
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 5 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G68 MP4 Mali-G610 MP3
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall 3rd gen
  • GPU frequency 1000 MHz 1000 MHz
  • Execution units 4 3
  • Shading units 48 -
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2. 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - -
  • Max Size 8 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 550
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6E
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 1280

CPU
24%
GPU
18%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

MediaTek Dimensity 7030

CPU
33%
GPU
21%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote