78

Points
Samsung Exynos 1280

78

Points
MediaTek Helio G85
Overview - Exynos 1280 Vs Helio G85

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 1280 vs Helio G85 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 1280 24
Helio G85 14
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 1280 18
Helio G85 10
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 1280 82
Helio G85 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 1280 41
Helio G85 27
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 1280 Helio G85
CPU 121972 67123
GPU 104889 61260
Memory 77341 42828
UX 106223 77565
Total score 410425 248776
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 1280

  • Exynos 1280 has 20.00% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G85 (2400 vs 2000 MHz).
  • Exynos 1280 has 18.50% higher memory frequency than Helio G85 (2133 vs 1800 MHz).
  • Exynos 1280 has 58.33% smaller sized transistor than Helio G85 (5 vs 12 nm).
  • Exynos 1280 has 64.98% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G85 (410 K vs 249 K).
  • Exynos 1280 has latest instruction set, hence better than Helio G85.
  • Exynos 1280 Support 300.00% higher memory bandwidth than Helio G85 (1200 vs 300 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1280 733
Helio G85 361

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1280 1832
Helio G85 1279

Image compression

icon
Exynos 1280 116.6
Helio G85 81.2

Face detection

icon
Exynos 1280 13.5
Helio G85 11.9

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 1280 33.1
Helio G85 24.2

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 1280 29.3
Helio G85 18.1

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 1280 13.1
Helio G85 9.26

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 1280 1.97
Helio G85 1.55

SQLite

icon
Exynos 1280 556.4
Helio G85 413.5

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 13 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test 4 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @120 Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

53%
Turbo Clock Speed

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75
    6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 5 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G68 MP4 Mali-G52 MP2
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Bifrost 2
  • GPU frequency 1000 MHz 1000 MHz
  • Execution units 4 2
  • Shading units 48 32
  • FLOPS - 59 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.0
  • OpenCL version 2. 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1800 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 13.41 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Neural Engine
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 7
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 1280

CPU
24%
GPU
18%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

MediaTek Helio G85

CPU
14%
GPU
10%
Memory
21%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote