78

Points
Samsung Exynos 1280

78

Points
Mediatek Helio G99
Overview - Exynos 1280 Vs Helio G99

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 1280 vs Helio G99 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 1280 24
Helio G99 20
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 1280 18
Helio G99 15
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 1280 82
Helio G99 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 1280 41
Helio G99 38
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 1280 Helio G99
CPU 121972 103357
GPU 104889 86376
Memory 77341 89007
UX 106223 101683
Total score 410425 380423
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 1280

  • Exynos 1280 has 9.09% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G99 (2400 vs 2200 MHz).
  • Exynos 1280 has 16.67% smaller sized transistor than Helio G99 (5 vs 6 nm).
  • Exynos 1280 has 7.89% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G99 (410 K vs 380 K).
  • Exynos 1280 has latest instruction set, hence better than Helio G99.

Pros of Mediatek Helio G99

  • Helio G99 has 100.00% higher memory frequency than Exynos 1280 (4266 vs 2133 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1280 733
Helio G99 543

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1280 1832
Helio G99 1740

Image compression

icon
Exynos 1280 116.6
Helio G99 114.8

Face detection

icon
Exynos 1280 13.5
Helio G99 14.3

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 1280 33.1
Helio G99 36.1

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 1280 29.3
Helio G99 30.2

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 1280 13.1
Helio G99 16.4

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 1280 1.97
Helio G99 1.73

SQLite

icon
Exynos 1280 556.4
Helio G99 599.6

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 13 FPS
Stability 99%

Graphics test 8 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @120 Hz Full HD+ @120 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 5 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G68 MP4 Mali-G57 MC2
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall
  • GPU frequency 1000 MHz 1000 MHz
  • Execution units 4 2
  • Shading units 48 32
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2. 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 4266 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 17.1 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 10 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 13
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 1280

CPU
24%
GPU
18%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

Mediatek Helio G99

CPU
20%
GPU
15%
Memory
50%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote