Menu

42

Points
Samsung Exynos 1330

Exynos 1330

59

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 9000

Dimensity 9000
Overview - Exynos 1330 Vs Dimensity 9000

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 1330 vs Dimensity 9000 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 1330 26
Dimensity 9000 47
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 1330 18
Dimensity 9000 45
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 1330 82
Dimensity 9000 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 1330 42
Dimensity 9000 59
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 1330 Dimensity 9000
CPU 133870 254411
GPU 84349 384881
Memory 79108 180981
UX 117360 185288
Total score 414687 1005561
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9000

  • Dimensity 9000 has 27.08% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 1330 (3050 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9000 has 17.19% higher memory frequency than Exynos 1330 (3750 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9000 has 20% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 1330 (4 vs 5 nm).
  • Dimensity 9000 has 142.49% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 1330 (1,006 K vs 415 K ).
  • Dimensity 9000 has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 1330.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1330 770
Dimensity 9000 1275

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1330 2384
Dimensity 9000 4132

3DMark

0%
Exynos 1330
Stability %

Graphics test -
40%
Dimensity 9000
Stability 90%

Graphics test 47 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @120Hz WQHD+ @144Hz / Full HD+ @180Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 3200 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

59%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

75%
Turbo Clock Speed

3050 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

44%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 1 MB
  • L3 cache - 8 MB
  • Process 5 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 4 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali G68 MP2 Mali-G710 MP10
  • Architecture Valhal 2 Valhall 3
  • GPU frequency - 850 MHz
  • Execution units 2 10
  • Shading units - 512
  • FLOPS - 1648 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3750 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 60 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 590
  • Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3200 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 2550 Mbps 7000 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - -
  • 5G Upload Speed 1280 Mbps 2500 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed - -
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 1330

Samsung Exynos 1330
CPU
26%
GPU
18%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

MediaTek Dimensity 9000
CPU
47%
GPU
45%
Memory
44%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote