Menu

40

Points
Samsung Exynos 1330

Exynos 1330

91

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 9400

Dimensity 9400
Overview - Exynos 1330 Vs Dimensity 9400

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 1330 vs Dimensity 9400 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 1330 23
Dimensity 9400 91
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 1330 15
Dimensity 9400 94
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 1330 82
Dimensity 9400 89
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 1330 40
Dimensity 9400 91
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 1330 Dimensity 9400
CPU 133870 600293
GPU 84349 1194784
Memory 79108 408283
UX 117360 443652
Total score 414687 2647012
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9400

  • Dimensity 9400 has 51.25% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 1330 (3630 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 66.66% higher memory frequency than Exynos 1330 (5333 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 40% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 1330 (3 vs 5 nm).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 538.32% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 1330 (2,647 K vs 415 K ).
  • Dimensity 9400 has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 1330.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1330 770
Dimensity 9400 2876

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1330 2384
Dimensity 9400 8972

3DMark

0%
Exynos 1330
Stability %

Graphics test -
96%
Dimensity 9400
Stability 18674%

Graphics test 56 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @120Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

59%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

90%
Turbo Clock Speed

3630 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

59%
Base Frequency

2400 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     1x 3.63 GHz – Cortex-X925
    3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
    4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 12 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 5 nm 3 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 8.2 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali G68 MP2 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
  • Architecture Valhal 2 Valhall 5th gen
  • GPU frequency - 1612 MHz
  • Execution units 2 -
  • Shading units - 192
  • FLOPS - 7428 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 3.2
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 5333 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - -
  • Max Size 8 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek NPU 890
  • Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 2550 Mbps -
  • 4G Download Speed - -
  • 5G Upload Speed 1280 Mbps -
  • 4G Upload Speed - -
  • Wi-Fi 5 7
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 1330

Samsung Exynos 1330
CPU
23%
GPU
15%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

MediaTek Dimensity 9400

MediaTek Dimensity 9400
CPU
91%
GPU
94%
Memory
62%
Energy efficiency and battery life
89%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote