78

Points
Samsung Exynos 1380

78

Points
Apple A14 Bionic
Overview - Exynos 1380 Vs A14 Bionic

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 1380 vs A14 Bionic SoCs by Samsung and Apple respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 1380 30
A14 Bionic 50
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 1380 22
A14 Bionic 47
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 1380 82
A14 Bionic 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 1380 45
A14 Bionic 60
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 1380 A14 Bionic
CPU 151675 203493
GPU 135413 284242
Memory 110932 131989
UX 124860 131211
Total score 522880 750935
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 1380

  • Exynos 1380 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than A14 Bionic (3200 vs 2133 MHz).

Pros of Apple A14 Bionic

  • A14 Bionic has 29.17% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 1380 (3100 vs 2400 MHz).
  • A14 Bionic has 43.62% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 1380 (751 K vs 523 K ).
  • A14 Bionic has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 1380.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1380 761
A14 Bionic 1611

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1380 2696
A14 Bionic 4209

Image compression

icon
Exynos 1380
A14 Bionic 171.5

Face detection

icon
Exynos 1380
A14 Bionic 33.6

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 1380
A14 Bionic 94.8

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 1380
A14 Bionic 93.1

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 1380
A14 Bionic 38.7

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 1380
A14 Bionic 4.5

SQLite

icon
Exynos 1380
A14 Bionic 1060

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability 77%

Graphics test 50 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 144 Hz Full HD+ (2.7K) @ 60Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2732 x 2048
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

82%
Turbo Clock Speed

3100 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 3.1 GHz – Firestorm
    4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm
  • Cores 8 6
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.5-A
  • L1 cache - 128 KB
  • L2 cache - 8 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 5 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count - 11.8 Billion
  • TDP - 6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G68 MP5 Apple A14 GPU
  • Architecture Valhall 2 -
  • GPU frequency 950 MHz -
  • Execution units 5 4
  • Shading units - -
  • FLOPS 608 Gigaflops 998 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 34.1 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 6 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Neural Engine
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 NVMe
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2732 x 2048
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8 H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 1380

CPU
30%
GPU
22%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

Apple A14 Bionic

CPU
50%
GPU
47%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote