We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
Exynos 2100 vs A16 Bionic chip SoCs by
Samsung and Apple
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
8-core
and 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 210041
A16 Bionic chip61
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 210036
A16 Bionic chip62
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 210082
A16 Bionic chip86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 210053
A16 Bionic chip70
SoC
Exynos 2100
VS
A16 Bionic chip
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
Exynos 2100
A16 Bionic chip
CPU
202484
247110
GPU
285430
408357
Memory
123653
162944
UX
140161
146541
Total score
751728
964952
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect
Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
A16 Bionic chip has
19.31%
higher CPU clock speed than
Exynos 2100 (3460 vs
2900 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
83.95%
higher GPU clock speed than
Exynos 2100 (1398 vs
760 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
100.00%
higher memory frequency than
Exynos 2100 (6400 vs
3200 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
20%
smaller sized transistor than
Exynos 2100 (4 vs
5 nm).
A16 Bionic chip has
28.36%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
Exynos 2100 (965 K vs
752 K ).
A16 Bionic chip has latest
instruction set,
hence better than
Exynos 2100.