Menu

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 2100

Exynos 2100

78

Points
Google Tensor

Tensor
Overview - Exynos 2100 Vs Tensor

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2100 vs Tensor SoCs by Samsung and Google respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2100 41
Tensor 36
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2100 36
Tensor 34
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2100 82
Tensor 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2100 53
Tensor 51
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2100 Tensor
CPU 202484 181161
GPU 285430 294446
Memory 123653 103174
UX 140161 145388
Total score 751728 724169
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2100

  • Exynos 2100 has 3.57% higher CPU clock speed than Tensor (2900 vs 2800 MHz).
  • Exynos 2100 has 3.81% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tensor (752 K vs 724 K).
  • Exynos 2100 has latest instruction set, hence better than Tensor.

Pros of Google Tensor

  • Tensor has 11.58% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 2100 (848 vs 760 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2100 1088
Tensor 1026

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2100 3624
Tensor 2879

Image compression

icon
Exynos 2100 170.5
Tensor

Face detection

icon
Exynos 2100 26.7
Tensor

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 2100 64.15
Tensor

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 2100 51.35
Tensor

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 2100 33.9
Tensor

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 2100 3.21
Tensor

SQLite

icon
Exynos 2100 970.15
Tensor

3DMark

29%
Exynos 2100
Stability 66%

Graphics test 33 FPS
32%
Tensor
Stability 56%

Graphics test 37 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 4K @ 120 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz 4k, FHD+ @ 60 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 4096 x 2160 3840 x 2160
  • Max External Display 8K @ 60 Hz -
  • HDR HDR10+ HDR
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

77%
Turbo Clock Speed

2900 MHz

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

100%
Base Frequency

2200 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-X1
    3x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
    2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 3 MB
  • L3 cache - 4 MB
  • Process 5 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 9 W 5.6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G78 MP14 Mali-G78 MP20
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall
  • GPU frequency 760 MHz 848 MHz
  • Execution units 14 20
  • Shading units 224 320
  • FLOPS 976 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) AI Engine with Triple-core NPU and DSP (26 TOPS) Tensor Processing Unit
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 4096 x 2160 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Exynos Modem 5200 Exynos 5300g
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2100

Samsung Exynos 2100
CPU
41%
GPU
36%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

Google Tensor

Google Tensor
CPU
36%
GPU
34%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote