Exynos 2100 Vs Dimensity 8200
We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2100 vs Dimensity 8200 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8200
- Dimensity 8200 has 6.9% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 2100 (3100 vs 2900 MHz).
- Dimensity 8200 has 100.00% higher memory frequency than Exynos 2100 (6400 vs 3200 MHz).
- Dimensity 8200 has 20% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 2100 (4 vs 5 nm).
- Dimensity 8200 has 13.14% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 2100 (851 K vs 752 K ).
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 202484 | 210639 |
| GPU | 285430 | 339646 |
| Memory | 123653 | 139322 |
| UX | 140161 | 160894 |
| Total score | 751728 | 850501 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | 170.5 Mpixels/s | - |
| Face detection | 26.7 images/s | - |
| Speech recognition | 64.15 words/s | - |
| Machine learning | 51.35 images/s | - |
| Camera shooting | 33.9 images/s | - |
| HTML 5 | 3.21 Mnodes/s | - |
| SQLite | 970.15 Mnodes/s | - |
3DMark
44%
Samsung 21000%
Dimensity 8200Score: 5655
| Stability | 66% | - |
| Graphics test | 33 FPS | - |
| Score | 5655 | - |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Samsung Exynos 2100 and Mediatek Dimensity 8200Display
| Max On-Device Display | 4K @ 120 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz | 120Hz WQHD+ / 180Hz Full HD+ display support |
| Max On-Display Resolution | 4096 x 2160 | 2960 x 1440 |
| Max External Display | 8K @ 60 Hz | - |
| HDR | HDR10+ | HDR10+ Adaptive support |
| Color Depth | Up to 10-bit | - |
| Color Gamut | Rec2020 | - |
CPU
84%
Samsung 210090%
Dimensity 8200
Processor Speed (Frequency)
| Architecture |
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-X1 3x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A78 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78 3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78 4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2900 MHz | 3100 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.4-A | - |
| L1 cache | - | - |
| L2 cache | - | - |
| L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor count | - | - |
| TDP | 9 W | - |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP14 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| Architecture | Valhall 2 | Valhall 2 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | - |
| Execution units | 14 | 6 |
| Shading units | 224 | - |
| FLOPS | 976 Gigaflops | - |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenCL version | 2 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 6400 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 16 GB | - |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | AI Engine with Triple-core NPU and DSP (26 TOPS) | MediaTek APU 580(Multi-Core) |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 4096 x 2160 | 2960 x 1440 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 320MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC |
Connectivity
Download Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Upload Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
| Modem | Exynos Modem 5200 | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 21 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download speed | Up to 7526 Mbps | Up to 4700 Mbps |
| Peak Upload speed | Up to 3758 Mbps | Up to 2500 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
Info
| Announced Date | December 2020 | December 2022 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | S5E9840 | - |
| Official page | Exynos 2100 official site | Dimensity 8200 official site |
Samsung Exynos 2100
60
Review By TenzysTech
Mediatek Dimensity 8200
53.75
Review By TenzysTech
