Menu

48

Points
Samsung Exynos 2100

Exynos 2100

28

Points
Mediatek Helio G95

Helio G95
Overview - Exynos 2100 Vs Helio G95

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2100 vs Helio G95 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2100 34
Helio G95 16
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2100 29
Helio G95 12
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2100 82
Helio G95 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2100 48
Helio G95 28
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2100 Helio G95
CPU 202484 91718
GPU 285430 91234
Memory 123653 58340
UX 140161 59442
Total score 751728 300734
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2100

  • Exynos 2100 has 41.46% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G95 (2900 vs 2050 MHz).
  • Exynos 2100 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Helio G95 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Exynos 2100 has 58.33% smaller sized transistor than Helio G95 (5 vs 12 nm).
  • Exynos 2100 has 149.96% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G95 (752 K vs 301 K).
  • Exynos 2100 has latest instruction set, hence better than Helio G95.
  • Exynos 2100 Support 412.00% higher memory bandwidth than Helio G95 (3072 vs 600 MHz).

Pros of Mediatek Helio G95

  • Helio G95 has 18.42% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 2100 (900 vs 760 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2100 1088
Helio G95 529

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2100 3624
Helio G95 1680

Image compression

icon
Exynos 2100 170.5
Helio G95 96.2

Face detection

icon
Exynos 2100 26.7
Helio G95 14.6

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 2100 64.15
Helio G95 31.1

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 2100 51.35
Helio G95 26.4

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 2100 33.9
Helio G95 13.8

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 2100 3.21
Helio G95 1.97

SQLite

icon
Exynos 2100 970.15
Helio G95 444.9

3DMark

29%
Exynos 2100
Stability 66%

Graphics test 33 FPS
7%
Helio G95
Stability 98%

Graphics test 8 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 4K @ 120 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz Full HD+ @ 90Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 4096 x 2160 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display 8K @ 60 Hz -
  • HDR HDR10+ HDR10+
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

72%
Turbo Clock Speed

2900 MHz

51%
Turbo Clock Speed

2050 MHz

54%
Base Frequency

2200 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-X1
    3x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 5 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 9 W 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G78 MP14 Mali-G76 3EEMC4
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Bifrost
  • GPU frequency 760 MHz 900 MHz
  • Execution units 14 4
  • Shading units 224 64
  • FLOPS 976 Gigaflops 195.8 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 10 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) AI Engine with Triple-core NPU and DSP (26 TOPS) Da Vinci
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 4096 x 2160 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Exynos Modem 5200 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 12
  • 5G support Yes No
  • 5G Download Speed 7526 Mbps -
  • 4G Download Speed 3072 Mbps 600 Mbps
  • 5G Upload Speed 3758 Mbps -
  • 4G Upload Speed 422 Mbps 150 Mbps
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2100

Samsung Exynos 2100
CPU
34%
GPU
29%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

Mediatek Helio G95

Mediatek Helio G95
CPU
16%
GPU
12%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%

FAQ - Which Processor is Better?

Which processor is better in Turbo Frequency between Exynos 2100 and Helio G95?

The processor with the higher Turbo Frequency is: Exynos 2100 with a 41.46% higher clock speed (2900 MHz vs 2050 MHz).

Which processor is better in GPU Frequency between Exynos 2100 and Helio G95?

The processor with the higher GPU Frequency is: Helio G95 with a 18.42% higher GPU clock speed (900 MHz vs 760 MHz).

Which processor is better in Memory Frequency between Exynos 2100 and Helio G95?

The processor with the higher Memory Frequency is: Exynos 2100 with a 50.02% higher memory frequency (3200 MHz vs 2133 MHz).

Which processor has a smaller transistor size between Exynos 2100 and Helio G95?

The processor with a smaller transistor size is: Exynos 2100 with a 58.33% smaller transistor size (5 nm vs 12 nm).

Which processor has a better AnTuTu score between Exynos 2100 and Helio G95?

The processor with the better AnTuTu score is: Exynos 2100 with a 149.96% better score (751728 vs 300734).

Choose between two processors

Cast your vote

Total Votes: 0