We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
Exynos 2100 vs Helio G95 SoCs by
Samsung and Mediatek
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 210041
Helio G9519
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 210036
Helio G9514
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 210082
Helio G9557
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 210053
Helio G9530
SoC
Exynos 2100
VS
Helio G95
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
Exynos 2100
Helio G95
CPU
202484
91718
GPU
285430
91234
Memory
123653
58340
UX
140161
59442
Total score
751728
300734
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2100
Exynos 2100 has
41.46%
higher CPU clock speed than
Helio G95 (2900 vs
2050 MHz).
Exynos 2100 has
50.02%
higher memory frequency than
Helio G95 (3200 vs
2133 MHz).
Exynos 2100 has
58.33%
smaller sized transistor than
Helio G95 (5 vs
12 nm).
Exynos 2100 has
149.96%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
Helio G95 (752 K
vs
301 K).
Exynos 2100 has latest instruction set, hence
better than
Helio G95.
Exynos 2100 Support
412.00%
higher memory bandwidth than
Helio G95 (3072 vs
600 MHz).
Pros of Mediatek Helio G95
Helio G95 has
18.42%
higher GPU clock speed than
Exynos 2100 (900 vs
760 MHz).