We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
Exynos 2200 vs A14 Bionic SoCs by
Samsung and Apple
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
8-core
and 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 220043
A14 Bionic50
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 220043
A14 Bionic47
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 220086
A14 Bionic82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 220057
A14 Bionic60
SoC
Exynos 2200
VS
A14 Bionic
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
Exynos 2200
A14 Bionic
CPU
223163
203493
GPU
391575
284242
Memory
175188
131989
UX
154579
131211
Total score
944505
750935
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect
Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
Exynos 2200 has
50.02%
higher memory frequency than
A14 Bionic (3200 vs
2133 MHz).
Exynos 2200 has
20%
smaller sized transistor than
A14 Bionic (4 vs
5 nm).
Exynos 2200 has
25.78%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
A14 Bionic (945 K
vs
751 K).
Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence
better than
A14 Bionic.
Pros of Apple A14 Bionic
A14 Bionic has
10.71%
higher CPU clock speed than
Exynos 2200 (3100 vs
2800 MHz).