78

Points
Samsung Exynos 2200

78

Points
Apple A14 Bionic
Overview - Exynos 2200 Vs A14 Bionic

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs A14 Bionic SoCs by Samsung and Apple respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2200 43
A14 Bionic 50
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2200 43
A14 Bionic 47
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2200 86
A14 Bionic 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2200 57
A14 Bionic 60
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2200 A14 Bionic
CPU 223163 203493
GPU 391575 284242
Memory 175188 131989
UX 154579 131211
Total score 944505 750935
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200

  • Exynos 2200 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than A14 Bionic (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 20% smaller sized transistor than A14 Bionic (4 vs 5 nm).
  • Exynos 2200 has 25.78% better AnTuTu 9 score than A14 Bionic (945 K vs 751 K).
  • Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence better than A14 Bionic.

Pros of Apple A14 Bionic

  • A14 Bionic has 10.71% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 2200 (3100 vs 2800 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 1164
A14 Bionic 1611

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 3570
A14 Bionic 4209

Image compression

icon
Exynos 2200
A14 Bionic 171.5

Face detection

icon
Exynos 2200
A14 Bionic 33.6

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 2200
A14 Bionic 94.8

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 2200
A14 Bionic 93.1

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 2200
A14 Bionic 38.7

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 2200
A14 Bionic 4.5

SQLite

icon
Exynos 2200
A14 Bionic 1060

3DMark

Stability 59%

Graphics test 39 FPS
Stability 77%

Graphics test 50 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - Full HD+ (2.7K) @ 60Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2732 x 2048
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

82%
Turbo Clock Speed

3100 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
    2x 3.1 GHz – Firestorm
    4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm
  • Cores 8 6
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.5-A
  • L1 cache - 128 KB
  • L2 cache - 8 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 4 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count - 11.8 Billion
  • TDP - 6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Apple A14 GPU
  • Architecture RDNA 2 -
  • GPU frequency 1300 MHz -
  • Execution units 24 4
  • Shading units 384 -
  • FLOPS - 998 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 34.1 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 6 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Neural Engine
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 NVMe
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2732 x 2048
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2200

CPU
43%
GPU
43%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Apple A14 Bionic

CPU
50%
GPU
47%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote