78

Points
Samsung Exynos 2200

78

Points
Google Tensor G2
Overview - Exynos 2200 Vs Tensor G2

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Tensor G2 SoCs by Samsung and Google respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2200 43
Tensor G2 39
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2200 43
Tensor G2 36
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2200 86
Tensor G2 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2200 57
Tensor G2 52
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2200 Tensor G2
CPU 223163 203226
GPU 391575 298514
Memory 175188 114682
UX 154579 157662
Total score 944505 774084
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200

  • Exynos 2200 has 52.94% higher GPU clock speed than Tensor G2 (1300 vs 850 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 20% smaller sized transistor than Tensor G2 (4 vs 5 nm).
  • Exynos 2200 has 22.02% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tensor G2 (945 K vs 774 K).
  • Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Tensor G2.

Pros of Google Tensor G2

  • Tensor G2 has 1.79% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 2200 (2850 vs 2800 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 1164
Tensor G2 1059

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 3570
Tensor G2 3251

Image compression

icon
Exynos 2200
Tensor G2 168.3

Face detection

icon
Exynos 2200
Tensor G2 24.5

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 2200
Tensor G2 69.4

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 2200
Tensor G2 71.2

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 2200
Tensor G2 31.2

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 2200
Tensor G2 2.97

SQLite

icon
Exynos 2200
Tensor G2 1010

3DMark

Stability 59%

Graphics test 39 FPS
Stability 72%

Graphics test 38 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - Ultra HD(4K)
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 3840 x 2160
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR10+, HDR
  • Color Depth - Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

75%
Turbo Clock Speed

2850 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
    2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1
    2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.4-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - 4 MB
  • Process 4 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 7 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Mali-G710 MP7
  • Architecture RDNA 2 Valhall 3
  • GPU frequency 1300 MHz 850 MHz
  • Execution units 24 7
  • Shading units 384 112
  • FLOPS - 1153 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Exynos 5300g
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2200

CPU
43%
GPU
43%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Google Tensor G2

CPU
39%
GPU
36%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote