Exynos 2200 Vs Tensor G2
We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Tensor G2 SoCs by Samsung and Google respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
- Exynos 2200 has 52.94% higher GPU clock speed than Tensor G2 (1300 vs 850 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 has 20% smaller sized transistor than Tensor G2 (4 vs 5 nm).
- Exynos 2200 has 22.02% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tensor G2 (945 K vs 774 K).
- Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Tensor G2.
Pros of Google Tensor G2
- Tensor G2 has 1.79% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 2200 (2850 vs 2800 MHz).
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
CPU | 223163 | 203226 |
GPU | 391575 | 298514 |
Memory | 175188 | 114682 |
UX | 154579 | 157662 |
Total score | 944505 | 774084 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Image compression | - | 168.3 Mpixels/s |
Face detection | - | 24.5 images/s |
Speech recognition | - | 69.4 words/s |
Machine learning | - | 71.2 images/s |
Camera shooting | - | 31.2 images/s |
HTML 5 | - | 2.97 Mnodes/s |
SQLite | - | 1010 Mnodes/s |
3DMark
50%
Samsung 220049%
Tensor G2Score: 6531
Stability | 59% | 72% |
Graphics test | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
Score | 6531 | 6381 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Samsung Exynos 2200 and Google Tensor G2Display
Max On-Device Display | - | Ultra HD(4K) |
Max On-Display Resolution | - | 3840 x 2160 |
Max External Display | - | - |
HDR | - | HDR10+, HDR |
Color Depth | - | Up to 10-bit |
Color Gamut | - | - |
CPU
74%
Samsung 220075%
Tensor G2
Processor Speed (Frequency)
Architecture |
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1 2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Cores | 8 | 8 |
Base Frequency | 1820 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Turbo Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2850 MHz |
Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.4-A |
L1 cache | - | - |
L2 cache | - | - |
L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
Process | 4 nm | 5 nm |
Transistor count | - | - |
TDP | - | 7 W |
Graphics
GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
Architecture | RDNA 2 | Valhall 3 |
GPU frequency | 1300 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 24 | 7 |
Shading units | 384 | 112 |
FLOPS | - | 1153 Gigaflops |
Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Bus | 4x16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 51.2 Gbit/s |
Max size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit |
Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP |
Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
Download Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Upload Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Modem | - | Exynos 5300g |
4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 24 |
5G support | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download speed | Up to 7526 Mbps | Up to 7350 Mbps |
Peak Upload speed | Up to 3758 Mbps | Up to 3670 Mbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
Info
Announced Date | January 2022 | October 2022 |
Class | Flagship | Flagship |
Model number | S5E9925 | - |
Official page | Exynos 2200 official site | Tensor G2 official site |