Menu

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 2200

Exynos 2200

78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 1050

Dimensity 1050
Overview - Exynos 2200 Vs Dimensity 1050

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 1050 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2200 43
Dimensity 1050 27
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2200 43
Dimensity 1050 22
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2200 86
Dimensity 1050 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2200 57
Dimensity 1050 43
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2200 Dimensity 1050
CPU 223163 137500
GPU 391575 159729
Memory 175188 96303
UX 154579 129591
Total score 944505 523123
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200

  • Exynos 2200 has 12.00% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 1050 (2800 vs 2500 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 30.00% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 1050 (1300 vs 1000 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 1050 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Exynos 2200 has 80.55% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 1050 (945 K vs 523 K).
  • Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 1050.
  • Exynos 2200 Support 8.30% higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 1050 (3000 vs 2770 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 1164
Dimensity 1050 745

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 3570
Dimensity 1050 2142

3DMark

33%
Exynos 2200
Stability 59%

Graphics test 39 FPS
13%
Dimensity 1050
Stability 97%

Graphics test 15 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - FHD+ @144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR10+ Adaptive, CUVA HDR-vivid, HLG and Dolby Vision
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
     2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 4 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Mali-G610 MC3
  • Architecture RDNA 2 Valhall 3
  • GPU frequency 1300 MHz 1000 MHz
  • Execution units 24 3
  • Shading units 384 -
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 24 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 550
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2200

Samsung Exynos 2200
CPU
43%
GPU
43%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Mediatek Dimensity 1050

Mediatek Dimensity 1050
CPU
27%
GPU
22%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote