Menu

52

Points
Samsung Exynos 2200

Exynos 2200

40

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 7050

Dimensity 7050
Overview - Exynos 2200 Vs Dimensity 7050

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 7050 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2200 36
Dimensity 7050 24
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2200 34
Dimensity 7050 18
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2200 86
Dimensity 7050 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2200 52
Dimensity 7050 40
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2200 Dimensity 7050
CPU 223163 144109
GPU 391575 140847
Memory 175188 126627
UX 154579 139513
Total score 944505 551096
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200

  • Exynos 2200 has 7.69% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 7050 (2800 vs 2600 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 62.50% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 7050 (1300 vs 800 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 7050 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Exynos 2200 has 71.39% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 7050 (945 K vs 551 K).
  • Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 7050.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 1164
Dimensity 7050 832

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 3570
Dimensity 7050 2328

3DMark

33%
Exynos 2200
Stability 59%

Graphics test 39 FPS
22%
Dimensity 7050
Stability 99%

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - Full HD+ @120 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

69%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

64%
Turbo Clock Speed

2600 MHz

45%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
     2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 4 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 4 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Mali-G68 MC4
  • Architecture RDNA 2 Valhall 2
  • GPU frequency 1300 MHz 800 MHz
  • Execution units 24 4
  • Shading units 384 64
  • FLOPS - 686 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 24 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 3.0
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 7526 Mbps 2770 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed 3000 Mbps -
  • 5G Upload Speed 3758 Mbps 1250 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed 422 Mbps -
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2200

Samsung Exynos 2200
CPU
36%
GPU
34%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

MediaTek Dimensity 7050

MediaTek Dimensity 7050
CPU
24%
GPU
18%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote