Exynos 2200 Vs Dimensity 7200
We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 7200 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
- Exynos 2200 has 50.61% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 7200 (945 K vs 627 K).
- Exynos 2200 Support 25.80% higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 7200 (51.2 vs 40.7 MHz).
Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 7200
- Dimensity 7200 has 100.00% higher memory frequency than Exynos 2200 (6400 vs 3200 MHz).
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 223163 | 160410 |
| GPU | 391575 | 202112 |
| Memory | 175188 | 119625 |
| UX | 154579 | 144980 |
| Total score | 944505 | 627127 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | - | - |
| Face detection | - | - |
| Speech recognition | - | - |
| Machine learning | - | - |
| Camera shooting | - | - |
| HTML 5 | - | - |
| SQLite | - | - |
3DMark
50%
Samsung 220032%
Dimensity 7200Score: 6531
| Stability | 59% | - |
| Graphics test | 39 FPS | 24 FPS |
| Score | 6531 | 4142 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Samsung Exynos 2200 and Mediatek Dimensity 7200Display
| Max On-Device Display | - | QHD+@90 Hz, FHD+@144 Hz |
| Max On-Display Resolution | - | 2560 x 1440 |
| Max External Display | - | - |
| HDR | - | HDR10+ |
| Color Depth | - | - |
| Color Gamut | - | - |
CPU
74%
Samsung 220074%
Dimensity 7200
Processor Speed (Frequency)
| Architecture |
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1820 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv9-A |
| L1 cache | - | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | - | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor count | - | 12 Billion |
| TDP | - | 8 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2 | Valhall 2 |
| GPU frequency | 1300 MHz | - |
| Execution units | 24 | 4 |
| Shading units | 384 | 512 |
| FLOPS | - | - |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 6400 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 40.7 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Mediatek APU 650 |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
Download Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Upload Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
| Modem | - | 2CC 5G Modem |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 21 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download speed | Up to 7526 Mbps | Up to 4700 Mbps |
| Peak Upload speed | Up to 3758 Mbps | - |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced Date | January 2022 | February 2023 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | S5E9925 | MT6886 |
| Official page | Exynos 2200 official site | Dimensity 7200 official site |
Samsung Exynos 2200
52.5
Review By TenzysTech
Mediatek Dimensity 7200
36
Review By TenzysTech
