Overview - Exynos 2200 Vs Dimensity 8050

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 8050 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2200 41
Dimensity 8050 37
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2200 42
Dimensity 8050 30
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2200 86
Dimensity 8050 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2200 56
Dimensity 8050 49
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2200 Dimensity 8050
CPU 223163 217200
GPU 391575 208098
Memory 175188 138670
UX 154579 138035
Total score 944505 702003
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200

  • Exynos 2200 has 52.94% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 8050 (1300 vs 850 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 8050 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 8050 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Exynos 2200 has 34.54% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 8050 (945 K vs 702 K).
  • Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 8050.

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8050

  • Dimensity 8050 has 7.14% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 2200 (3000 vs 2800 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 1164
Dimensity 8050 964

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 3570
Dimensity 8050 3261

3DMark

Stability 59%

Graphics test 39 FPS
Stability 96%

Graphics test 27 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - QHD+ @ 90 Hz, FHD+ @ 168 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

69%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

3000 MHz

45%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
    1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 4 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Mali-G77 MC9
  • Architecture RDNA 2 Valhall
  • GPU frequency 1300 MHz 850 MHz
  • Execution units 24 9
  • Shading units 384 144
  • FLOPS - 980 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 34.1 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 570
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 19
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 7526 Mbps 4700 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed 3000 Mbps -
  • 5G Upload Speed 3758 Mbps 2500 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed 422 Mbps -
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2200

CPU
41%
GPU
42%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

MediaTek Dimensity 8050

CPU
37%
GPU
30%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote