78

Points
Samsung Exynos 2200

78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 810
Overview - Exynos 2200 Vs Dimensity 810

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 810 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2200 43
Dimensity 810 23
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2200 43
Dimensity 810 16
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2200 86
Dimensity 810 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2200 57
Dimensity 810 39
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2200 Dimensity 810
CPU 223163 113696
GPU 391575 85477
Memory 175188 76385
UX 154579 105966
Total score 944505 381524
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200

  • Exynos 2200 has 16.67% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 810 (2800 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 52.94% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 810 (1300 vs 850 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 810 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 810 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Exynos 2200 has 147.56% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 810 (945 K vs 382 K).
  • Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 810.
  • Exynos 2200 Support 199.94% higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 810 (51.2 vs 17.07 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 Support 150.00% higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 810 (3000 vs 1200 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 1164
Dimensity 810 621

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 3570
Dimensity 810 1897

3DMark

Stability 59%

Graphics test 39 FPS
Stability 99%

Graphics test 7 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - FHD+ @ 120Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR10
  • Color Depth - Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut - Rec2020
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
    2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - 512 KB
  • L2 cache - 1 MB
  • L3 cache - 2 MB
  • Process 4 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - 12 Billion
  • TDP - 8 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Mali-G57 MC2
  • Architecture RDNA 2 Valhall
  • GPU frequency 1300 MHz 850 MHz
  • Execution units 24 2
  • Shading units 384 32
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 17.07 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 3.0
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2200

CPU
43%
GPU
43%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Mediatek Dimensity 810

CPU
23%
GPU
16%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote