Exynos 2200 Vs Dimensity 8100
We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 8100 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
- Exynos 2200 has 42.54% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 8100 (1300 vs 912 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 has 20% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 8100 (4 vs 5 nm).
- Exynos 2200 has 16.82% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 8100 (945 K vs 809 K).
- Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 8100.
Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8100
- Dimensity 8100 has 1.79% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 2200 (2850 vs 2800 MHz).
- Dimensity 8100 has 100.00% higher memory frequency than Exynos 2200 (6400 vs 3200 MHz).
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
CPU | 223163 | 204875 |
GPU | 391575 | 311503 |
Memory | 175188 | 130636 |
UX | 154579 | 161518 |
Total score | 944505 | 808532 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Image compression | - | - |
Face detection | - | - |
Speech recognition | - | - |
Machine learning | - | - |
Camera shooting | - | - |
HTML 5 | - | - |
SQLite | - | - |
3DMark
50%
Samsung 220043%
Dimensity 8100Score: 6531
Stability | 59% | 94% |
Graphics test | 39 FPS | 34 FPS |
Score | 6531 | 5620 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Samsung Exynos 2200 and Mediatek Dimensity 8100Display
Max On-Device Display | - | WQHD+ @120Hz / Full HD+ @168Hz |
Max On-Display Resolution | - | 2960 x 1440 |
Max External Display | - | - |
HDR | - | HDR10+ |
Color Depth | - | - |
Color Gamut | - | - |
CPU
74%
Samsung 220075%
Dimensity 8100
Processor Speed (Frequency)
Architecture |
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Cores | 8 | 8 |
Base Frequency | 1820 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Turbo Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2850 MHz |
Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.2-A |
L1 cache | - | - |
L2 cache | - | - |
L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
Process | 4 nm | 5 nm |
Transistor count | - | - |
TDP | - | 8 W |
Graphics
GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
Architecture | RDNA 2 | Valhall 2 |
GPU frequency | 1300 MHz | 912 MHz |
Execution units | 24 | 6 |
Shading units | 384 | - |
FLOPS | - | - |
Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 6400 MHz |
Bus | 4x16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 51.2 Gbit/s |
Max size | 24 GB | - |
Multimedia (ISP)
Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | APU 580 (multi-core) |
Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2960 x 1440 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | 1x 200MP |
Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC |
Connectivity
Download Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Upload Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Modem | - | R16-ready 5G modem |
4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 21 |
5G support | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download speed | Up to 7526 Mbps | Up to 4700 Mbps |
Peak Upload speed | Up to 3758 Mbps | - |
Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
Info
Announced Date | January 2022 | March 2022 |
Class | Flagship | Flagship |
Model number | S5E9925 | MT6895Z/TCZA |
Official page | Exynos 2200 official site | Dimensity 8100 official site |