Exynos 2200 Vs Dimensity 8200
We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 8200 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
- Exynos 2200 has 11.05% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 8200 (945 K vs 851 K).
- Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 8200.
Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8200
- Dimensity 8200 has 10.71% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 2200 (3100 vs 2800 MHz).
- Dimensity 8200 has 100.00% higher memory frequency than Exynos 2200 (6400 vs 3200 MHz).
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 223163 | 210639 |
| GPU | 391575 | 339646 |
| Memory | 175188 | 139322 |
| UX | 154579 | 160894 |
| Total score | 944505 | 850501 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | - | - |
| Face detection | - | - |
| Speech recognition | - | - |
| Machine learning | - | - |
| Camera shooting | - | - |
| HTML 5 | - | - |
| SQLite | - | - |
3DMark
50%
Samsung 22000%
Dimensity 8200Score: 6531
| Stability | 59% | - |
| Graphics test | 39 FPS | - |
| Score | 6531 | - |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Samsung Exynos 2200 and Mediatek Dimensity 8200Display
| Max On-Device Display | - | 120Hz WQHD+ / 180Hz Full HD+ display support |
| Max On-Display Resolution | - | 2960 x 1440 |
| Max External Display | - | - |
| HDR | - | HDR10+ Adaptive support |
| Color Depth | - | - |
| Color Gamut | - | - |
CPU
81%
Samsung 220090%
Dimensity 8200
Frequency
| Architecture |
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78 3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78 4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1820 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2800 MHz | 3100 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | - |
| L1 cache | - | - |
| L2 cache | - | - |
| L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
| Process | 4 | 4 |
| Transistor count | - | - |
| TDP | - | - |
Graphics
| GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2 | Valhall 2 |
| GPU frequency | 1300 MHz | - |
| Execution units | 24 | 6 |
| Shading units | 384 | - |
| FLOPS | - | - |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 6400 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | - |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | MediaTek APU 580(Multi-Core) |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2960 x 1440 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | 1x 320MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC |
Connectivity
Download Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Upload Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
| Modem | - | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 21 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download speed | Up to 7526 Mbps | Up to 4700 Mbps |
| Peak Upload speed | Up to 3758 Mbps | Up to 2500 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
Info
| Announced Date | January 2022 | December 2022 |
| Class | Flagship | Mid range |
| Model number | S5E9925 | - |
| Official page | Exynos 2200 official site | Dimensity 8200 official site |
Samsung Exynos 2200
67.25
Review By TenzysTech
Mediatek Dimensity 8200
56.5
Review By TenzysTech
