Overview - Exynos 2200 Vs Dimensity 9400

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 9400 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2200 36
Dimensity 9400 91
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2200 34
Dimensity 9400 94
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2200 86
Dimensity 9400 89
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2200 52
Dimensity 9400 91
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2200 Dimensity 9400
CPU 223163 600293
GPU 391575 1194784
Memory 175188 408283
UX 154579 443652
Total score 944505 2647012
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9400

  • Dimensity 9400 has 29.64% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 2200 (3630 vs 2800 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 24.00% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 2200 (1612 vs 1300 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 66.66% higher memory frequency than Exynos 2200 (5333 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 25% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 2200 (3 vs 4 nm).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 180.25% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 2200 (2,647 K vs 945 K ).
  • Dimensity 9400 has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 2200.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 1164
Dimensity 9400 2876

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 3570
Dimensity 9400 8972

3DMark

Stability 59%

Graphics test 39 FPS
Stability 18674%

Graphics test 56 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - -
  • Max On-Display Resolution - -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

69%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

90%
Turbo Clock Speed

3630 MHz

45%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

59%
Base Frequency

2400 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
    1x 3.63 GHz – Cortex-X925
    3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
    4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 12 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 4 nm 3 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 8.2 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
  • Architecture RDNA 2 Valhall 5th gen
  • GPU frequency 1300 MHz 1612 MHz
  • Execution units 24 -
  • Shading units 384 192
  • FLOPS - 7428 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 3.2
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 5333 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 24 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek NPU 890
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 7526 Mbps -
  • 4G Download Speed 3000 Mbps -
  • 5G Upload Speed 3758 Mbps -
  • 4G Upload Speed 422 Mbps -
  • Wi-Fi 6 7
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2200

CPU
36%
GPU
34%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

MediaTek Dimensity 9400

CPU
91%
GPU
94%
Memory
62%
Energy efficiency and battery life
89%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote