Menu

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 2200

Exynos 2200

78

Points
MediaTek Helio G37

Helio G37
Overview - Exynos 2200 Vs Helio G37

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Helio G37 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2200 43
Helio G37 14
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2200 43
Helio G37 8
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2200 86
Helio G37 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2200 57
Helio G37 26
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2200 Helio G37
CPU 223163 37521
GPU 391575 27112
Memory 175188 33579
UX 154579 40621
Total score 944505 138833
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200

  • Exynos 2200 has 21.74% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G37 (2800 vs 2300 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 91.18% higher GPU clock speed than Helio G37 (1300 vs 680 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 100.00% higher memory frequency than Helio G37 (3200 vs 1600 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 66.67% smaller sized transistor than Helio G37 (4 vs 12 nm).
  • Exynos 2200 has 580.32% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G37 (945 K vs 139 K).
  • Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Helio G37.
  • Exynos 2200 Support 268.35% higher memory bandwidth than Helio G37 (51.2 vs 13.9 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 Support 900.00% higher memory bandwidth than Helio G37 (3000 vs 300 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 1164
Helio G37 914

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 3570
Helio G37 178

3DMark

33%
Exynos 2200
Stability 59%

Graphics test 39 FPS
N/A
Helio G37
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - Full HD+ @90 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2400 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

61%
Turbo Clock Speed

2300 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
     4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A53
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 4 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 2.2 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 IMG PowerVR GE8320
  • Architecture RDNA 2 Rogue
  • GPU frequency 1300 MHz 680 MHz
  • Execution units 24 2
  • Shading units 384 64
  • FLOPS - 56 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 1.2
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 1600 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 13.9 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes No
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2400 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 50MP, 2x 13MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 1K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 1080p at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 7
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2200

Samsung Exynos 2200
CPU
43%
GPU
43%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

MediaTek Helio G37

MediaTek Helio G37
CPU
14%
GPU
8%
Memory
19%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote