78

Points
Samsung Exynos 2200

78

Points
Mediatek Helio G95
Overview - Exynos 2200 Vs Helio G95

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Helio G95 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2200 43
Helio G95 19
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2200 43
Helio G95 14
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2200 86
Helio G95 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2200 57
Helio G95 30
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2200 Helio G95
CPU 223163 91718
GPU 391575 91234
Memory 175188 58340
UX 154579 59442
Total score 944505 300734
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200

  • Exynos 2200 has 36.59% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G95 (2800 vs 2050 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 44.44% higher GPU clock speed than Helio G95 (1300 vs 900 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Helio G95 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 66.67% smaller sized transistor than Helio G95 (4 vs 12 nm).
  • Exynos 2200 has 214.07% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G95 (945 K vs 301 K).
  • Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Helio G95.
  • Exynos 2200 Support 400.00% higher memory bandwidth than Helio G95 (3000 vs 600 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 1164
Helio G95 529

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 3570
Helio G95 1680

Image compression

icon
Exynos 2200
Helio G95 96.2

Face detection

icon
Exynos 2200
Helio G95 14.6

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 2200
Helio G95 31.1

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 2200
Helio G95 26.4

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 2200
Helio G95 13.8

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 2200
Helio G95 1.97

SQLite

icon
Exynos 2200
Helio G95 444.9

3DMark

Stability 59%

Graphics test 39 FPS
Stability 98%

Graphics test 8 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - Full HD+ @ 90Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2050 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
    2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 4 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Mali-G76 3EEMC4
  • Architecture RDNA 2 Bifrost
  • GPU frequency 1300 MHz 900 MHz
  • Execution units 24 4
  • Shading units 384 64
  • FLOPS - 195.8 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 24 GB 10 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Da Vinci
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 12
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2200

CPU
43%
GPU
43%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Mediatek Helio G95

CPU
19%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote