We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
Exynos 2200 vs Helio G96 SoCs by
Samsung and Mediatek
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 220041
Helio G9620
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 220042
Helio G9614
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 220086
Helio G9657
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 220056
Helio G9630
SoC
Exynos 2200
VS
Helio G96
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
Exynos 2200
Helio G96
CPU
223163
98570
GPU
391575
76840
Memory
175188
70017
UX
154579
94023
Total score
944505
339450
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
Exynos 2200 has
36.59%
higher CPU clock speed than
Helio G96 (2800 vs
2050 MHz).
Exynos 2200 has
36.84%
higher GPU clock speed than
Helio G96 (1300 vs
950 MHz).
Exynos 2200 has
50.02%
higher memory frequency than
Helio G96 (3200 vs
2133 MHz).
Exynos 2200 has
66.67%
smaller sized transistor than
Helio G96 (4 vs
12 nm).
Exynos 2200 has
178.25%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
Helio G96 (945 K
vs
339 K).
Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence
better than
Helio G96.
Exynos 2200 Support
400.00%
higher memory bandwidth than
Helio G96 (3000 vs
600 MHz).