Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Exynos 2200
- Exynos 2200 has 40.00% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 690 (2800 vs 2000 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 has 36.84% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 690 (1300 vs 950 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 690 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 has 50% smaller sized transistor Snapdragon 690 (4 vs 8 nm).
- Exynos 2200 has 173.46% better AnTuTu 9 score Snapdragon 690 (945 K vs 345 K).
- Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Snapdragon 690.
- Exynos 2200 Support 243.62% higher memory bandwidth then Snapdragon 690 (51.2 vs 14.9 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 Support 150.00% higher memory bandwidth then Snapdragon 690 (3000 vs 1200 MHz).
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 223163 | 110385 |
| GPU | 391575 | 76645 |
| Memory | 175188 | 63724 |
| UX | 154579 | 94636 |
| Total score | 944505 | 345390 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | - | 111.3 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | - | 16.9 images/s |
| Speech recognition | - | 28.8 words/s |
| Machine learning | - | 26.7 images/s |
| Camera shooting | - | 15.9 images/s |
| HTML 5 | - | 2.25 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | - | 579.5 Mnodes/s |
3DMark
88%
Exynos 220070%
Snapdragon 690Score: 6531
| Stability | 59% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 39 FPS | 4 FPS |
| Score | 6531 | 811 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Samsung Exynos 2200 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 690Display
| Max On-Device Display | - | FHD+ @ 120 Hz |
| Max On-Display Resolution | - | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max External Display | - | QHD @ 60Hz |
| HDR | - | HDR10 |
| Color Depth | - | Up to 10-bit |
| Color Gamut | - | Rec2020 |
CPU
81%
Exynos 220058%
Snapdragon 690
Frequency
| Architecture | 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2, 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710, 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 | 2x 2 GHz – Kryo 560 Gold (Cortex-A77), 6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 560 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1820 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | - | - |
| L2 cache | - | - |
| L3 cache | - | - |
| Process | 4 | 8 |
| Transistor count | - | - |
| TDP | - | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Adreno 619L |
| Architecture | 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2, 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710, 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 | 2x 2 GHz – Kryo 560 Gold (Cortex-A77), 6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 560 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| GPU frequency | 1300 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution units | 24 | 2 |
| Shading units | 384 | 128 |
| FLOPS | - | - |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 14.9 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon 692 |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | 1x 192MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
Download Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Upload Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
| Modem | - | X51 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download speed | Up to 7526 Mbps | Up to 2500 Mbps |
| Peak Upload speed | Up to 3758 Mbps | Up to 900 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced Date | January 2022 | June 2020 |
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Model number | S5E9925 | SM6350 |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 2200 official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 official site |
Samsung Exynos 2200
75
Review By TenzysTech
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
40.5
Review By TenzysTech
