Menu

52

Points
Samsung Exynos 2200

Exynos 2200

37

Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695

Snapdragon 695
Overview - Exynos 2200 Vs Snapdragon 695

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 695 SoCs by Samsung and Qualcomm respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2200 36
Snapdragon 695 19
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2200 34
Snapdragon 695 13
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2200 86
Snapdragon 695 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2200 52
Snapdragon 695 37
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2200 Snapdragon 695
CPU 223163 115765
GPU 391575 93638
Memory 175188 60715
UX 154579 101282
Total score 944505 371400
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200

  • Exynos 2200 has 27.27% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 695 (2800 vs 2200 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 54.76% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 695 (1300 vs 840 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 695 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 695 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Exynos 2200 has 154.31% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 695 (945 K vs 371 K).
  • Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Snapdragon 695.
  • Exynos 2200 Support 275.00% higher memory bandwidth than Snapdragon 695 (3000 vs 800 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 1164
Snapdragon 695 664

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 3570
Snapdragon 695 1869

Image compression

icon
Exynos 2200
Snapdragon 695 111.3

Face detection

icon
Exynos 2200
Snapdragon 695 16.9

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 2200
Snapdragon 695 28.8

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 2200
Snapdragon 695 26.7

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 2200
Snapdragon 695 15.9

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 2200
Snapdragon 695 2.25

SQLite

icon
Exynos 2200
Snapdragon 695 579.5

3DMark

33%
Exynos 2200
Stability 59%

Graphics test 39 FPS
6%
Snapdragon 695
Stability 99%

Graphics test 7 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - FHD+ @ 120 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR10
  • Color Depth - Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut - Rec2020
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

69%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

45%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

42%
Base Frequency

1700 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
     2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A77)
    6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 4 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Adreno 619
  • Architecture RDNA 2 Adreno 600
  • GPU frequency 1300 MHz 840 MHz
  • Execution units 24 -
  • Shading units 384 128
  • FLOPS - 536 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 17 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 686
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 1K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 1080p at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Snapdragon X51
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 7526 Mbps 2500 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed 3000 Mbps 800 Mbps
  • 5G Upload Speed 3758 Mbps 1500 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed 422 Mbps 210 Mbps
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2200

Samsung Exynos 2200
CPU
36%
GPU
34%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
CPU
19%
GPU
13%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

FAQ - Which Processor is Better?

Which processor is better in Turbo Frequency between Exynos 2200 and Snapdragon 695?

The processor with the higher Turbo Frequency is: Exynos 2200 with a 27.27% higher clock speed (2800 MHz vs 2200 MHz).

Which processor is better in GPU Frequency between Exynos 2200 and Snapdragon 695?

The processor with the higher GPU Frequency is: Exynos 2200 with a 54.76% higher GPU clock speed (1300 MHz vs 840 MHz).

Which processor is better in Memory Frequency between Exynos 2200 and Snapdragon 695?

The processor with the higher Memory Frequency is: Exynos 2200 with a 50.02% higher memory frequency (3200 MHz vs 2133 MHz).

Which processor has a smaller transistor size between Exynos 2200 and Snapdragon 695?

The processor with a smaller transistor size is: Exynos 2200 with a 33.33% smaller transistor size (4 nm vs 6 nm).

Which processor has a better AnTuTu score between Exynos 2200 and Snapdragon 695?

The processor with the better AnTuTu score is: Exynos 2200 with a 154.31% better score (944505 vs 371400).