Overview - Exynos 2200 Vs Snapdragon 778G Plus

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 778G Plus SoCs by Samsung and Qualcomm respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2200 43
Snapdragon 778G Plus 33
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2200 43
Snapdragon 778G Plus 26
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2200 86
Snapdragon 778G Plus 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2200 57
Snapdragon 778G Plus 46
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2200 Snapdragon 778G Plus
CPU 223163 166382
GPU 391575 177972
Memory 175188 106394
UX 154579 130486
Total score 944505 581234
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200

  • Exynos 2200 has 12.00% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 778G Plus (2800 vs 2500 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 136.36% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 778G Plus (1300 vs 550 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 778G Plus (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Exynos 2200 has 62.50% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 778G Plus (945 K vs 581 K).
  • Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Snapdragon 778G Plus.
  • Exynos 2200 Support 100.00% higher memory bandwidth than Snapdragon 778G Plus (51.2 vs 25.6 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 1164
Snapdragon 778G Plus 816

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 3570
Snapdragon 778G Plus 2971

3DMark

Stability 59%

Graphics test 39 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test 16 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - FHD+ @ 144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - 4K @ 60 Hz
  • HDR - HDR10+, HDR10
  • Color Depth - Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut - Rec. 2020
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
    1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
    3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
    4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.4-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 2 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 4 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Adreno 642L
  • Architecture RDNA 2 Adreno 600
  • GPU frequency 1300 MHz 550 MHz
  • Execution units 24 2
  • Shading units 384 384
  • FLOPS - 845 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 25.6 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 770
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 192MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - X53
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2200

CPU
43%
GPU
43%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

CPU
33%
GPU
26%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote