Menu

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 2200

Exynos 2200

78

Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G

Snapdragon 782G
Overview - Exynos 2200 Vs Snapdragon 782G

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 782G SoCs by Samsung and Qualcomm respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2200 43
Snapdragon 782G 37
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2200 43
Snapdragon 782G 31
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2200 86
Snapdragon 782G 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2200 57
Snapdragon 782G 49
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2200 Snapdragon 782G
CPU 223163 172419
GPU 391575 233993
Memory 175188 98521
UX 154579 110849
Total score 944505 615782
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200

  • Exynos 2200 has 3.70% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 782G (2800 vs 2700 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 136.36% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 782G (1300 vs 550 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 782G (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Exynos 2200 has 53.38% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 782G (945 K vs 616 K).
  • Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Snapdragon 782G.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 1164
Snapdragon 782G 956

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 3570
Snapdragon 782G 3478

3DMark

33%
Exynos 2200
Stability 59%

Graphics test 39 FPS
N/A
Snapdragon 782G
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - FHD+ @ 144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 4K @ 60 Hz
  • Max External Display - 4K @ 60 Hz
  • HDR - HDR10+, HDR10, HLG
  • Color Depth - Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut - Rec. 2020
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

71%
Turbo Clock Speed

2700 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
     1x 2.7 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime core (Cortex-A78)
    3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (also Cortex-A78)
    4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.3-A
  • L1 cache - 512 KB
  • L2 cache - 1 MB
  • L3 cache - 2 MB
  • Process 4 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - 4.68 Billion
  • TDP - 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Adreno 642L
  • Architecture RDNA 2 Adreno 600
  • GPU frequency 1300 MHz 550 MHz
  • Execution units 24 -
  • Shading units 384 512
  • FLOPS - 906.58 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 17 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 2x16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 770
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x200 MP, 2x64 MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30 FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 4K at 60 FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - X53
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6/6E
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GLONASS, NavIC, Beidou, GPS, QZSS, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2200

Samsung Exynos 2200
CPU
43%
GPU
43%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G

Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
CPU
37%
GPU
31%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote