Overview - Exynos 2200 Vs Snapdragon 888 Plus

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 888 Plus SoCs by Samsung and Qualcomm respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2200 43
Snapdragon 888 Plus 43
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2200 43
Snapdragon 888 Plus 39
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2200 86
Snapdragon 888 Plus 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2200 57
Snapdragon 888 Plus 55
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2200 Snapdragon 888 Plus
CPU 223163 216591
GPU 391575 324286
Memory 175188 138188
UX 154579 167760
Total score 944505 846825
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200

  • Exynos 2200 has 43.65% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 888 Plus (1300 vs 905 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 20% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 888 Plus (4 vs 5 nm).
  • Exynos 2200 has 11.53% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 888 Plus (945 K vs 847 K).
  • Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Snapdragon 888 Plus.

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus

  • Snapdragon 888 Plus has 6.96% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 2200 (2995 vs 2800 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 1164
Snapdragon 888 Plus 1171

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 3570
Snapdragon 888 Plus 3704

3DMark

Stability 59%

Graphics test 39 FPS
Stability 99%

Graphics test 33 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - 4K Ultra HD @ 60 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 3840 x 2160
  • Max External Display - 4K @ 60 Hz
  • HDR - Hybrid Log Gamma (HLG), HDR10+, Dolby Vision®, HDR10
  • Color Depth - Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut - Rec. 2020
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

79%
Turbo Clock Speed

2995 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
    1x 2.995 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
    3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
    4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.4-A
  • L1 cache - 512 KB
  • L2 cache - 1 MB
  • L3 cache - 4 MB
  • Process 4 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count - 10.3 Billion
  • TDP - 8 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Adreno 660
  • Architecture RDNA 2 Adreno 600
  • GPU frequency 1300 MHz 905 MHz
  • Execution units 24 2
  • Shading units 384 512
  • FLOPS - 1853 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 780
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 2000MP, 2x 25MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 8K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - X60
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 22
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2200

CPU
43%
GPU
43%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus

CPU
43%
GPU
39%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote