78

Points
Samsung Exynos 2200

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 850
Overview - Exynos 2200 Vs Exynos 850

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Exynos 850 SoCs by Samsung. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2200 43
Exynos 850 9
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2200 43
Exynos 850 6
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2200 86
Exynos 850 71
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2200 57
Exynos 850 29
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2200 Exynos 850
CPU 223163 47291
GPU 391575 21386
Memory 175188 40704
UX 154579 22040
Total score 944505 131421
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200

  • Exynos 2200 has 58.54% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 850 (1300 vs 820 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 71.49% higher memory frequency than Exynos 850 (3200 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 850 (4 vs 8 nm).
  • Exynos 2200 has 618.69% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 850 (945 K vs 131 K).
  • Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 850.
  • Exynos 2200 Support 900.00% higher memory bandwidth than Exynos 850 (3000 vs 300 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 1164
Exynos 850 150

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 3570
Exynos 850 937

Image compression

icon
Exynos 2200
Exynos 850 74.3

Face detection

icon
Exynos 2200
Exynos 850 10.4

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 2200
Exynos 850 16.7

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 2200
Exynos 850 12.4

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 2200
Exynos 850 5.29

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 2200
Exynos 850 1.38

SQLite

icon
Exynos 2200
Exynos 850 356.2

3DMark

Stability 59%

Graphics test 39 FPS
Stability 98%

Graphics test 3 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - Full HD+
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

0%
Turbo Clock Speed

MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
    8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 4 nm 8 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 3 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Mali-G52 MP1
  • Architecture RDNA 2 Bifrost
  • GPU frequency 1300 MHz 820 MHz
  • Execution units 24 6
  • Shading units 384 96
  • FLOPS - 126 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 1866 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 24 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes No
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 1K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 1080p at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 13
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2200

CPU
43%
GPU
43%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Samsung Exynos 850

CPU
9%
GPU
6%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote