We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
Exynos 2400 vs Apple A18 SoCs by
Samsung and Apple
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
10-core
and 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 240072
Apple A1882
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 240060
Apple A1884
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 240086
Apple A1889
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 240073
Apple A1885
SoC
Exynos 2400
VS
Apple A18
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
Exynos 2400
Apple A18
CPU
510545
421143
GPU
587630
615010
Memory
322132
178670
UX
260123
345874
Total score
1680430
1560697
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect
Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400
Exynos 2400 has
12.00%
higher memory frequency than
Apple A18 (4200 vs
3750 MHz).
Exynos 2400 has
7.67%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
Apple A18 (1,680 K
vs
1,561 K).
Pros of Apple A18
Apple A18 has
25.86%
higher CPU clock speed than
Exynos 2400 (4040 vs
3210 MHz).
Apple A18 has
38.55%
higher GPU clock speed than
Exynos 2400 (1398 vs
1009 MHz).
Apple A18 has
25%
smaller sized transistor than
Exynos 2400 (3 vs
4 nm).