73

Points
Samsung Exynos 2400

90

Points
Apple A18 Pro
Overview - Exynos 2400 Vs Apple A18 Pro

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2400 vs Apple A18 Pro SoCs by Samsung and Apple respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 10-core and 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2400 72
Apple A18 Pro 87
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2400 60
Apple A18 Pro 94
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2400 86
Apple A18 Pro 89
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2400 73
Apple A18 Pro 90
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2400 Apple A18 Pro
CPU 510545 475293
GPU 587630 719585
Memory 322132 259838
UX 260123 385136
Total score 1680430 1839852
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400

  • Exynos 2400 has 12.00% higher memory frequency than Apple A18 Pro (4200 vs 3750 MHz).

Pros of Apple A18 Pro

  • Apple A18 Pro has 47.67% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 2400 (1490 vs 1009 MHz).
  • Apple A18 Pro has 25% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 2400 (3 vs 4 nm).
  • Apple A18 Pro has 9.49% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 2400 (1,840 K vs 1,680 K ).
  • Apple A18 Pro has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 2400.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2400 2193
Apple A18 Pro 3342

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2400 6895
Apple A18 Pro 8147

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - -
  • Max On-Display Resolution - -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

79%
Turbo Clock Speed

3210 MHz

0%
Turbo Clock Speed

MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

100%
Base Frequency

4050 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
    2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A520
    2x 4.05 GHz – Everest
    4x 2.42 GHz – Sawtooth
  • Cores 10 6
  • Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 16 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 4 nm 3 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 10 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Samsung Xclipse 940 Apple A18 Pro GPU
  • Architecture Samsung Xclipse Apple Bionic GPU
  • GPU frequency 1009 MHz 1490 MHz
  • Execution units - -
  • Shading units - 128
  • FLOPS - 2289 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version - -
  • OpenCL version - -
  • DirectX version - -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 4200 MHz 3750 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 60 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Neural Engine
  • Storage type UFS 4.0 NVMe
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2400
  • Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 48MP
  • Video capture 8K at 60FPS 4K at 120FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS 4K at 120FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AAX, AAX+, AC-3, AIFF, CAF, E-AC-3, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Exynos 5300 Snapdragon X75
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 9640 Mbps 10000 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - 3500 Mbps
  • 5G Upload Speed 2550 Mbps 3500 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed - 1500 Mbps
  • Wi-Fi 7 7
  • Bluetooth 5.4 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2400

CPU
72%
GPU
60%
Memory
49%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Apple A18 Pro

CPU
87%
GPU
94%
Memory
44%
Energy efficiency and battery life
89%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote