78

Points
Samsung Exynos 850

78

Points
Apple A18
Overview - Exynos 850 Vs Apple A18

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 850 vs Apple A18 SoCs by Samsung and Apple respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 850 9
Apple A18 98
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 850 6
Apple A18 96
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 850 71
Apple A18 89
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 850 29
Apple A18 94
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 850 Apple A18
CPU 47291 421143
GPU 21386 615010
Memory 40704 178670
UX 22040 345874
Total score 131421 1560697
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences

Pros of Apple A18

  • Apple A18 has 70.49% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 850 (1398 vs 820 MHz).
  • Apple A18 has 301.93% higher memory frequency than Exynos 850 (7500 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Apple A18 has 62.5% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 850 (3 vs 8 nm).
  • Apple A18 has 1,087.56% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 850 (1,561 K vs 131 K ).
  • Apple A18 has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 850.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 850 150
Apple A18 3322

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 850 937
Apple A18 7602

Image compression

icon
Exynos 850 74.3
Apple A18

Face detection

icon
Exynos 850 10.4
Apple A18

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 850 16.7
Apple A18

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 850 12.4
Apple A18

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 850 5.29
Apple A18

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 850 1.38
Apple A18

SQLite

icon
Exynos 850 356.2
Apple A18

3DMark

Stability 98%

Graphics test 3 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

0%
Turbo Clock Speed

MHz

107%
Turbo Clock Speed

4040 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 4.04 GHz –
    4x 2 GHz –
  • Cores 8 6
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 8 nm 3 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 3 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G52 MP1 Apple A18 GPU
  • Architecture Bifrost Apple Bionic GPU
  • GPU frequency 820 MHz 1398 MHz
  • Execution units 6 -
  • Shading units 96 128
  • FLOPS 126 Gigaflops 1789.4 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 1866 MHz 7500 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - -
  • Max Size 8 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) No Neural Engine
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1 NVMe
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 48MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 8K at 24FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 8K at 24FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Snapdragon X75
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 7
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 850

CPU
9%
GPU
6%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%

Apple A18

CPU
98%
GPU
96%
Memory
88%
Energy efficiency and battery life
89%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote