Menu

28

Points
Samsung Exynos 850

Exynos 850

50

Points
Google Tensor

Tensor
Overview - Exynos 850 Vs Tensor

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 850 vs Tensor SoCs by Samsung and Google respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 850 8
Tensor 34
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 850 5
Tensor 33
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 850 71
Tensor 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 850 28
Tensor 50
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 850 Tensor
CPU 47291 181161
GPU 21386 294446
Memory 40704 103174
UX 22040 145388
Total score 131421 724169
Key Differences

Pros of Google Tensor

  • Tensor has 3.41% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 850 (848 vs 820 MHz).
  • Tensor has 71.49% higher memory frequency than Exynos 850 (3200 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Tensor has 37.5% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 850 (5 vs 8 nm).
  • Tensor has 451.03% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 850 (724 K vs 131 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 850 150
Tensor 1026

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 850 937
Tensor 2879

Image compression

icon
Exynos 850 74.3
Tensor

Face detection

icon
Exynos 850 10.4
Tensor

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 850 16.7
Tensor

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 850 12.4
Tensor

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 850 5.29
Tensor

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 850 1.38
Tensor

SQLite

icon
Exynos 850 356.2
Tensor

3DMark

3%
Exynos 850
Stability 98%

Graphics test 3 FPS
32%
Tensor
Stability 56%

Graphics test 37 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ 4k, FHD+ @ 60 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

0%
Turbo Clock Speed

MHz

69%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

44%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
    2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 3 MB
  • L3 cache - 4 MB
  • Process 8 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 3 W 5.6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G52 MP1 Mali-G78 MP20
  • Architecture Bifrost Valhall
  • GPU frequency 820 MHz 848 MHz
  • Execution units 6 20
  • Shading units 96 320
  • FLOPS 126 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 1866 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) No Tensor Processing Unit
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Exynos 5300g
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support No Yes
  • 5G Download Speed - 7350 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed 300 Mbps -
  • 5G Upload Speed - 3670 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed 150 Mbps -
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 850

Samsung Exynos 850
CPU
8%
GPU
5%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%

Google Tensor

Google Tensor
CPU
34%
GPU
33%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote