78

Points
Samsung Exynos 850

78

Points
Google Tensor G2
Overview - Exynos 850 Vs Tensor G2

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 850 vs Tensor G2 SoCs by Samsung and Google respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 850 9
Tensor G2 39
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 850 6
Tensor G2 36
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 850 71
Tensor G2 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 850 29
Tensor G2 52
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 850 Tensor G2
CPU 47291 203226
GPU 21386 298514
Memory 40704 114682
UX 22040 157662
Total score 131421 774084
Key Differences

Pros of Google Tensor G2

  • Tensor G2 has 3.66% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 850 (850 vs 820 MHz).
  • Tensor G2 has 71.49% higher memory frequency than Exynos 850 (3200 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Tensor G2 has 37.5% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 850 (5 vs 8 nm).
  • Tensor G2 has 489.01% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 850 (774 K vs 131 K ).
  • Tensor G2 has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 850.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 850 150
Tensor G2 1059

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 850 937
Tensor G2 3251

Image compression

icon
Exynos 850 74.3
Tensor G2 168.3

Face detection

icon
Exynos 850 10.4
Tensor G2 24.5

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 850 16.7
Tensor G2 69.4

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 850 12.4
Tensor G2 71.2

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 850 5.29
Tensor G2 31.2

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 850 1.38
Tensor G2 2.97

SQLite

icon
Exynos 850 356.2
Tensor G2 1010

3DMark

Stability 98%

Graphics test 3 FPS
Stability 72%

Graphics test 38 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ Ultra HD(4K)
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR10+, HDR
  • Color Depth - Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

0%
Turbo Clock Speed

MHz

75%
Turbo Clock Speed

2850 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1
    2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.4-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - 4 MB
  • Process 8 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 3 W 7 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G52 MP1 Mali-G710 MP7
  • Architecture Bifrost Valhall 3
  • GPU frequency 820 MHz 850 MHz
  • Execution units 6 7
  • Shading units 96 112
  • FLOPS 126 Gigaflops 1153 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 1866 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) No Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Exynos 5300g
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 850

CPU
9%
GPU
6%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%

Google Tensor G2

CPU
39%
GPU
36%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote