Menu

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 850

Exynos 850

78

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 6080

Dimensity 6080
Overview - Exynos 850 Vs Dimensity 6080

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 850 vs Dimensity 6080 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 850 9
Dimensity 6080 27
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 850 6
Dimensity 6080 17
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 850 71
Dimensity 6080 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 850 29
Dimensity 6080 41
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 850 Dimensity 6080
CPU 47291 135946
GPU 21386 69519
Memory 40704 103763
UX 22040 121897
Total score 131421 431125
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 6080

  • Dimensity 6080 has 15.85% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 850 (950 vs 820 MHz).
  • Dimensity 6080 has 14.31% higher memory frequency than Exynos 850 (2133 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Dimensity 6080 has 25% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 850 (6 vs 8 nm).
  • Dimensity 6080 has 228.05% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 850 (431 K vs 131 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 850 150
Dimensity 6080 778

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 850 937
Dimensity 6080 2075

Image compression

icon
Exynos 850 74.3
Dimensity 6080

Face detection

icon
Exynos 850 10.4
Dimensity 6080

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 850 16.7
Dimensity 6080

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 850 12.4
Dimensity 6080

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 850 5.29
Dimensity 6080

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 850 1.38
Dimensity 6080

SQLite

icon
Exynos 850 356.2
Dimensity 6080

3DMark

3%
Exynos 850
Stability 98%

Graphics test 3 FPS
N/A
Dimensity 6080
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ FHD+ @ 120 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

0%
Turbo Clock Speed

MHz

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - 512 KB
  • L2 cache - 1 MB
  • L3 cache - 2 MB
  • Process 8 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 3 W 6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G52 MP1 Mali-G57 MC2
  • Architecture Bifrost Valhall 1st gen
  • GPU frequency 820 MHz 950 MHz
  • Execution units 6 2
  • Shading units 96 64
  • FLOPS 126 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 1866 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 17.07 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) No Yes
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1 UFS 2.2
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 850

Samsung Exynos 850
CPU
9%
GPU
6%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%

MediaTek Dimensity 6080

MediaTek Dimensity 6080
CPU
27%
GPU
17%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote