Menu

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 850

Exynos 850

78

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 7020

Dimensity 7020
Overview - Exynos 850 Vs Dimensity 7020

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 850 vs Dimensity 7020 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 850 9
Dimensity 7020 30
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 850 6
Dimensity 7020 19
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 850 71
Dimensity 7020 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 850 29
Dimensity 7020 43
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 850 Dimensity 7020
CPU 47291 152839
GPU 21386 81155
Memory 40704 118550
UX 22040 124104
Total score 131421 476648
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7020

  • Dimensity 7020 has 9.76% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 850 (900 vs 820 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7020 has 71.49% higher memory frequency than Exynos 850 (3200 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7020 has 25% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 850 (6 vs 8 nm).
  • Dimensity 7020 has 262.69% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 850 (477 K vs 131 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 850 150
Dimensity 7020 897

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 850 937
Dimensity 7020 2282

Image compression

icon
Exynos 850 74.3
Dimensity 7020

Face detection

icon
Exynos 850 10.4
Dimensity 7020

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 850 16.7
Dimensity 7020

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 850 12.4
Dimensity 7020

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 850 5.29
Dimensity 7020

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 850 1.38
Dimensity 7020

SQLite

icon
Exynos 850 356.2
Dimensity 7020

3DMark

3%
Exynos 850
Stability 98%

Graphics test 3 FPS
N/A
Dimensity 7020
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ Full HD+@120Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

0%
Turbo Clock Speed

MHz

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 8 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 3 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G52 MP1 IMG BXM-8-256
  • Architecture Bifrost PowerVR IMG GPU
  • GPU frequency 820 MHz 900 MHz
  • Execution units 6 8
  • Shading units 96 18
  • FLOPS 126 Gigaflops 259.2 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 1866 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - -
  • Max Size 8 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) No Yes
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 (Dual lane)
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 850

Samsung Exynos 850
CPU
9%
GPU
6%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%

MediaTek Dimensity 7020

MediaTek Dimensity 7020
CPU
30%
GPU
19%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote