78

Points
Samsung Exynos 850
Overview - Exynos 850 Vs Dimensity 9000

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 850 vs Dimensity 9000 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 850 9
Dimensity 9000 49
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 850 6
Dimensity 9000 46
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 850 71
Dimensity 9000 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 850 29
Dimensity 9000 60
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 850 Dimensity 9000
CPU 47291 254411
GPU 21386 384881
Memory 40704 180981
UX 22040 185288
Total score 131421 1005561
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9000

  • Dimensity 9000 has 3.66% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 850 (850 vs 820 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9000 has 100.96% higher memory frequency than Exynos 850 (3750 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9000 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 850 (4 vs 8 nm).
  • Dimensity 9000 has 665.14% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 850 (1,006 K vs 131 K ).
  • Dimensity 9000 has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 850.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 850 150
Dimensity 9000 1275

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 850 937
Dimensity 9000 4132

Image compression

icon
Exynos 850 74.3
Dimensity 9000

Face detection

icon
Exynos 850 10.4
Dimensity 9000

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 850 16.7
Dimensity 9000

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 850 12.4
Dimensity 9000

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 850 5.29
Dimensity 9000

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 850 1.38
Dimensity 9000

SQLite

icon
Exynos 850 356.2
Dimensity 9000

3DMark

Stability 98%

Graphics test 3 FPS
Stability 90%

Graphics test 47 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ WQHD+ @144Hz / Full HD+ @180Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 3200 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

0%
Turbo Clock Speed

MHz

81%
Turbo Clock Speed

3050 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 1 MB
  • L3 cache - 8 MB
  • Process 8 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 3 W 4 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G52 MP1 Mali-G710 MP10
  • Architecture Bifrost Valhall 3
  • GPU frequency 820 MHz 850 MHz
  • Execution units 6 10
  • Shading units 96 512
  • FLOPS 126 Gigaflops 1648 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 1866 MHz 3750 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 60 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) No MediaTek APU 590
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3200 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 850

CPU
9%
GPU
6%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

CPU
49%
GPU
46%
Memory
44%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote