Exynos 850 Vs Dimensity 9000
We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 850 vs Dimensity 9000 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9000
- Dimensity 9000 has 3.66% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 850 (850 vs 820 MHz).
- Dimensity 9000 has 100.96% higher memory frequency than Exynos 850 (3750 vs 1866 MHz).
- Dimensity 9000 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 850 (4 vs 8 nm).
- Dimensity 9000 has 665.14% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 850 (1,006 K vs 131 K ).
- Dimensity 9000 has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 850.
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 47291 | 254411 |
| GPU | 21386 | 384881 |
| Memory | 40704 | 180981 |
| UX | 22040 | 185288 |
| Total score | 131421 | 1005561 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | 74.3 Mpixels/s | - |
| Face detection | 10.4 images/s | - |
| Speech recognition | 16.7 words/s | - |
| Machine learning | 12.4 images/s | - |
| Camera shooting | 5.29 images/s | - |
| HTML 5 | 1.38 Mnodes/s | - |
| SQLite | 356.2 Mnodes/s | - |
3DMark
4%
Exynos 85061%
Dimensity 9000Score: 7853
| Stability | 98% | 90% |
| Graphics test | 3 FPS | 47 FPS |
| Score | 505 | 7853 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Samsung Exynos 850 and MediaTek Dimensity 9000Display
| Max On-Device Display | Full HD+ | WQHD+ @144Hz / Full HD+ @180Hz |
| Max On-Display Resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 3200 x 1440 |
| Max External Display | - | - |
| HDR | - | HDR10+ |
| Color Depth | - | - |
| Color Gamut | - | - |
CPU
0%
Exynos 85081%
Dimensity 9000
Processor Speed (Frequency)
| Architecture |
8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | - | 3050 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| L1 cache | - | - |
| L2 cache | - | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | - | 8 MB |
| Process | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor count | - | - |
| TDP | 3 W | 4 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G52 MP1 | Mali-G710 MP10 |
| Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall 3 |
| GPU frequency | 820 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 6 | 10 |
| Shading units | 96 | 512 |
| FLOPS | 126 Gigaflops | 1648 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 3750 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | - | 60 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | No | MediaTek APU 590 |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 3200 x 1440 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP |
| Video capture | 1K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 1080p at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC |
Connectivity
Download Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Upload Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
| Modem | - | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 13 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
| Peak Download speed | - | Up to 7000 Mbps |
| Peak Upload speed | - | Up to 2500 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced Date | May 2020 | November 2021 |
| Class | Low end | Flagship |
| Model number | S5E3830 | MT6983 |
| Official page | Exynos 850 official site | Dimensity 9000 official site |
Samsung Exynos 850
27
Review By TenzysTech
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
45.25
Review By TenzysTech
