Menu

78

Points
Unisoc Tiger T612

Tiger T612

78

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 9300

Dimensity 9300
Overview - Tiger T612 Vs Dimensity 9300

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Tiger T612 vs Dimensity 9300 SoCs by Unisoc and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Tiger T612 14
Dimensity 9300 92
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Tiger T612 8
Dimensity 9300 95
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tiger T612 57
Dimensity 9300 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Tiger T612 26
Dimensity 9300 91
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Tiger T612 Dimensity 9300
CPU 67603 485064
GPU 22171 899463
Memory 61955 357691
UX 58129 312866
Total score 209858 2055084
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9300

  • Dimensity 9300 has 80.56% higher CPU clock speed than Tiger T612 (3250 vs 1800 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9300 has 100.00% higher GPU clock speed than Tiger T612 (1300 vs 650 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9300 has 200.00% higher memory frequency than Tiger T612 (4800 vs 1600 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9300 has 66.67% smaller sized transistor than Tiger T612 (4 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 9300 has 879.27% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tiger T612 (2,055 K vs 210 K ).
  • Dimensity 9300 has latest instruction set, hence better than Tiger T612.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Tiger T612 347
Dimensity 9300 2265

Multi-Core Score

icon
Tiger T612 1293
Dimensity 9300 7995

3DMark

2%
Tiger T612
Stability 97%

Graphics test 2 FPS
100%
Dimensity 9300
Stability %

Graphics test 116 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 60Hz, HD+ @ 90 Hz 4k@120Hz, WQHD@180Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2160 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - Yes
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

48%
Turbo Clock Speed

1800 MHz

86%
Turbo Clock Speed

3250 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75
    6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
     1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-X4
    3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - 18 MB
  • Process 12 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - 22.7 Billion
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
  • Architecture Valhall Valhall 5th gen
  • GPU frequency 650 MHz 1300 MHz
  • Execution units 1 12
  • Shading units - 192
  • FLOPS - 5990.4 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.0 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 11 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 1600 MHz 4800 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 76.8 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDRLPDDR5T
  • Bus 2x 32 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 790
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2160 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 50MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 1K at 30FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 30FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 7
  • Bluetooth 5.0 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Unisoc Tiger T612

Unisoc Tiger T612
CPU
14%
GPU
8%
Memory
19%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%

MediaTek Dimensity 9300

MediaTek Dimensity 9300
CPU
92%
GPU
95%
Memory
56%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote