78

Points
Unisoc Tiger T700

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 2400
Overview - Tiger T700 Vs Exynos 2400

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Tiger T700 vs Exynos 2400 SoCs by Unisoc and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 10-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Tiger T700 14
Exynos 2400 88
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Tiger T700 9
Exynos 2400 76
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tiger T700 57
Exynos 2400 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Tiger T700 27
Exynos 2400 83
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Tiger T700 Exynos 2400
CPU 67140 510545
GPU 43026 587630
Memory 44785 322132
UX 58416 260123
Total score 213367 1680430
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400

  • Exynos 2400 has 76.37% higher CPU clock speed than Tiger T700 (3210 vs 1820 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 18.71% higher GPU clock speed than Tiger T700 (1009 vs 850 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 125.08% higher memory frequency than Tiger T700 (4200 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 66.67% smaller sized transistor than Tiger T700 (4 vs 12 nm).
  • Exynos 2400 has 687.58% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tiger T700 (1,680 K vs 213 K ).
  • Exynos 2400 has latest instruction set, hence better than Tiger T700.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Tiger T700 355
Exynos 2400 2193

Multi-Core Score

icon
Tiger T700 1349
Exynos 2400 6895

Image compression

icon
Tiger T700 83.2
Exynos 2400

Face detection

icon
Tiger T700 9.85
Exynos 2400

Speech recognition

icon
Tiger T700 23.9
Exynos 2400

Machine learning

icon
Tiger T700 18.5
Exynos 2400

Camera shooting

icon
Tiger T700 9.6
Exynos 2400

HTML 5

icon
Tiger T700 1.37
Exynos 2400

SQLite

icon
Tiger T700 421.8
Exynos 2400

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @ 90Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2160 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

48%
Turbo Clock Speed

1820 MHz

85%
Turbo Clock Speed

3210 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A75
    6x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A55
    1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
    2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A520
  • Cores 8 10
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 12 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G52 MC2 Samsung Xclipse 940
  • Architecture Bifrost 2 Samsung Xclipse
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 1009 MHz
  • Execution units 2 -
  • Shading units 32 -
  • FLOPS 54.4 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.0 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 11 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 1866 MHz 4200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - -
  • Max Size 6 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2160 x 1080 3840 x 2400
  • Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 1K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem LTE Cat. 7 Exynos 5300
  • 4G support No LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support - Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 7
  • Bluetooth 5.0 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Unisoc Tiger T700

CPU
14%
GPU
9%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%

Samsung Exynos 2400

CPU
88%
GPU
76%
Memory
49%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote