We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
A16 Bionic chip vs Snapdragon 680 SoCs by
Apple and Qualcomm
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
6-core
and 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
A16 Bionic chip51
Snapdragon 68013
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
A16 Bionic chip54
Snapdragon 6808
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
A16 Bionic chip86
Snapdragon 68079
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
A16 Bionic chip64
Snapdragon 68033
SoC
A16 Bionic chip
VS
Snapdragon 680
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
A16 Bionic chip
Snapdragon 680
CPU
247110
81097
GPU
408357
38425
Memory
162944
68438
UX
146541
63600
Total score
964952
251560
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect
Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
A16 Bionic chip has
44.17%
higher CPU clock speed than
Snapdragon 680 (3460 vs
2400 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
25.49%
higher GPU clock speed than
Snapdragon 680 (1398 vs
1114 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
200.05%
higher memory frequency than
Snapdragon 680 (6400 vs
2133 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
33.33%
smaller sized transistor than
Snapdragon 680 (4 vs
6 nm).
A16 Bionic chip has
283.59%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
Snapdragon 680 (965 K
vs
252 K).
A16 Bionic chip has latest instruction set, hence
better than
Snapdragon 680.
