Overview - Kirin 9000 Vs Dimensity 9200 Plus

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Kirin 9000 vs Dimensity 9200 Plus SoCs by Hisilicon and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Kirin 9000 39
Dimensity 9200 Plus 57
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Kirin 9000 35
Dimensity 9200 Plus 61
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Kirin 9000 86
Dimensity 9200 Plus 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Kirin 9000 53
Dimensity 9200 Plus 68
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Kirin 9000 Dimensity 9200 Plus
CPU 194527 290704
GPU 280796 600560
Memory 146761 254170
UX 140303 217772
Total score 762387 1363206
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 7.03% higher CPU clock speed than Kirin 9000 (3350 vs 3130 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 210.29% higher memory frequency than Kirin 9000 (8533 vs 2750 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 78.81% better AnTuTu 9 score than Kirin 9000 (1,363 K vs 762 K ).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has latest instruction set, hence better than Kirin 9000.
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus Support 55.23% higher memory bandwidth than Kirin 9000 (68.3 vs 44 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 1054
Dimensity 9200 Plus 1545

Multi-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 3724
Dimensity 9200 Plus 5421

3DMark

Stability 54%

Graphics test 36 FPS
Stability 61%

Graphics test 75 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - WQHD @ 144Hz, FHD+ @ 240Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

77%
Turbo Clock Speed

3130 MHz

83%
Turbo Clock Speed

3350 MHz

51%
Base Frequency

2050 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77
    3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77
    4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55
    1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-X3
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache 64 KB -
  • L2 cache 0.512 MB 1 MB
  • L3 cache 4 MB 8 MB
  • Process 4 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count 15.3 Billion 17 Billion
  • TDP 4 W 8 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G78 MP24 Immortalis-G715 MC11
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall 4
  • GPU frequency 760 MHz -
  • Execution units 24 11
  • Shading units 384 -
  • FLOPS 1076 Gigaflops 4736 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2750 MHz 8533 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 44 Gbit/s 68.3 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) AI accelerator MediaTek APU 690
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Balong 5000 MediaTek T800
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 7168 Mbps 7900 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - -
  • 5G Upload Speed 2560 Mbps 4200 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed - -
  • Wi-Fi 6 7
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Hisilicon Kirin 9000

CPU
39%
GPU
35%
Memory
32%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

CPU
57%
GPU
61%
Memory
100%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote