Overview - Dimensity 810 Vs Dimensity 9200 Plus

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 810 vs Dimensity 9200 Plus SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 810 23
Dimensity 9200 Plus 60
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 810 16
Dimensity 9200 Plus 63
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 810 79
Dimensity 9200 Plus 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 810 39
Dimensity 9200 Plus 70
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 810 Dimensity 9200 Plus
CPU 113696 290704
GPU 85477 600560
Memory 76385 254170
UX 105966 217772
Total score 381524 1363206
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 39.58% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 810 (3350 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 300.05% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 810 (8533 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 810 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 257.31% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 810 (1,363 K vs 382 K ).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 810.
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus Support 300.12% higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 810 (68.3 vs 17.07 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 810 621
Dimensity 9200 Plus 1545

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 810 1897
Dimensity 9200 Plus 5421

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 7 FPS
Stability 61%

Graphics test 75 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120Hz WQHD @ 144Hz, FHD+ @ 240Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10 -
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

89%
Turbo Clock Speed

3350 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-X3
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache 512 KB -
  • L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
  • L3 cache 2 MB 8 MB
  • Process 6 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion 17 Billion
  • TDP 8 W 8 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC2 Immortalis-G715 MC11
  • Architecture Valhall Valhall 4
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz -
  • Execution units 2 11
  • Shading units 32 -
  • FLOPS - 4736 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 8533 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17.07 Gbit/s 68.3 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 MediaTek APU 690
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - MediaTek T800
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 7
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 810

CPU
23%
GPU
16%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

CPU
60%
GPU
63%
Memory
100%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote