Overview - Dimensity 920 Vs Snapdragon 680

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 920 vs Snapdragon 680 SoCs by Mediatek and Qualcomm respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 920 24
Snapdragon 680 13
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 920 17
Snapdragon 680 8
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 920 79
Snapdragon 680 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 920 40
Snapdragon 680 33
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 920 Snapdragon 680
CPU 139277 81097
GPU 128453 38425
Memory 96272 68438
UX 134315 63600
Total score 498317 251560
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 920

  • Dimensity 920 has 4.17% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 680 (2500 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Dimensity 920 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 680 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 920 has 98.09% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 680 (498 K vs 252 K).
  • Dimensity 920 Support 207.69% higher memory bandwidth than Snapdragon 680 (1200 vs 390 MHz).

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 680

  • Snapdragon 680 has 17.26% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 920 (1114 vs 950 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 920 792
Snapdragon 680 368

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 920 2592
Snapdragon 680 1496

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 12 FPS
Stability 99%

Graphics test 2 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120Hz FHD+ @ 90 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10 -
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 Rec2020
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

62%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

59%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

44%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)
    4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache 2 MB -
  • Process 6 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion -
  • TDP 10 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G68 MC4 Adreno 610
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Adreno 610
  • GPU frequency 950 MHz 1114 MHz
  • Execution units 4 2
  • Shading units 64 96
  • FLOPS 684 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 17 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 Hexagon 686
  • Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - X11
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 13
  • 5G support Yes No
  • 5G Download Speed 2770 Mbps -
  • 4G Download Speed 1200 Mbps 390 Mbps
  • 5G Upload Speed 2500 Mbps -
  • 4G Upload Speed 800 Mbps 150 Mbps
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 920

CPU
24%
GPU
17%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680

CPU
13%
GPU
8%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote