Menu

61

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

Dimensity 9200 Plus

59

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 8300

Dimensity 8300
Overview - Dimensity 9200 Plus Vs Dimensity 8300

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Dimensity 8300 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 9200 Plus 49
Dimensity 8300 47
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 9200 Plus 49
Dimensity 8300 45
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 9200 Plus 86
Dimensity 8300 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 9200 Plus 61
Dimensity 8300 59
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 9200 Plus Dimensity 8300
CPU 290704 282796
GPU 600560 542690
Memory 254170 328720
UX 217772 249840
Total score 1363206 1404046
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 100.02% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 8300 (8533 vs 4266 MHz).

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8300

  • Dimensity 8300 has 3.00% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 9200 Plus (1,404 K vs 1,363 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9200 Plus 1545
Dimensity 8300 1512

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9200 Plus 5421
Dimensity 8300 4886

3DMark

65%
Dimensity 9200 Plus
Stability 61%

Graphics test 75 FPS
N/A
Dimensity 8300
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display WQHD @ 144Hz, FHD+ @ 240Hz WQHD+ @ 120Hz, FHD+ @ 180Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2960 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

83%
Turbo Clock Speed

3350 MHz

83%
Turbo Clock Speed

3350 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

54%
Base Frequency

2200 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-X3
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
     1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715
    3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache 1 MB -
  • L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
  • Process 4 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count 17 Billion -
  • TDP 8 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Immortalis-G715 MC11 Mali-G615 MP6
  • Architecture Valhall 4 Valhall 4rd gen
  • GPU frequency - 1400 MHz
  • Execution units 11 6
  • Shading units - -
  • FLOPS 4736 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 8533 MHz 4266 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 68.3 Gbit/s 68.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 690 MediaTek APU 780
  • Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem MediaTek T800 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 7900 Mbps 7900 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - -
  • 5G Upload Speed 4200 Mbps 4200 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed - -
  • Wi-Fi 7 6
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
CPU
49%
GPU
49%
Memory
100%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

MediaTek Dimensity 8300

MediaTek Dimensity 8300
CPU
47%
GPU
45%
Memory
50%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote