Menu

78

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

Dimensity 9200 Plus

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 1480

Exynos 1480
Overview - Dimensity 9200 Plus Vs Exynos 1480

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Exynos 1480 SoCs by Mediatek and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 9200 Plus 60
Exynos 1480 44
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 9200 Plus 63
Exynos 1480 31
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 9200 Plus 86
Exynos 1480 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 9200 Plus 70
Exynos 1480 54
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 9200 Plus Exynos 1480
CPU 290704 239966
GPU 600560 172430
Memory 254170 149766
UX 217772 159472
Total score 1363206 721634
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 21.82% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 1480 (3350 vs 2750 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 166.66% higher memory frequency than Exynos 1480 (8533 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has 88.91% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 1480 (1,363 K vs 722 K).
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 1480.
  • Dimensity 9200 Plus Support 33.40% higher memory bandwidth than Exynos 1480 (68.3 vs 51.2 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9200 Plus 1545
Exynos 1480 1180

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 9200 Plus 5421
Exynos 1480 3536

3DMark

65%
Dimensity 9200 Plus
Stability 61%

Graphics test 75 FPS
N/A
Exynos 1480
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display WQHD @ 144Hz, FHD+ @ 240Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution - -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

89%
Turbo Clock Speed

3350 MHz

73%
Turbo Clock Speed

2750 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-X3
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
     4x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache 1 MB -
  • L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
  • Process 4 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count 17 Billion -
  • TDP 8 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Immortalis-G715 MC11 -
  • Architecture Valhall 4 -
  • GPU frequency - 1300 MHz
  • Execution units 11 -
  • Shading units - -
  • FLOPS 4736 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.3 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 8533 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 68.3 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 24 GB 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 690 Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem MediaTek T800 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 7 6
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
CPU
60%
GPU
63%
Memory
100%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Samsung Exynos 1480

Samsung Exynos 1480
CPU
44%
GPU
31%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote