Menu

78

Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680

Snapdragon 680

78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 8200

Dimensity 8200
Overview - Snapdragon 680 Vs Dimensity 8200

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 680 vs Dimensity 8200 SoCs by Qualcomm and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 680 16
Dimensity 8200 43
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 680 10
Dimensity 8200 40
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 680 79
Dimensity 8200 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 680 35
Dimensity 8200 56
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 680 Dimensity 8200
CPU 81097 210639
GPU 38425 339646
Memory 68438 139322
UX 63600 160894
Total score 251560 850501
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8200

  • Dimensity 8200 has 29.17% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 680 (3100 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 200.05% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 680 (6400 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 680 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 238.09% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 680 (851 K vs 252 K ).
  • Dimensity 8200 Support 201.18% higher memory bandwidth than Snapdragon 680 (51.2 vs 17 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 680 368
Dimensity 8200 1054

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 680 1496
Dimensity 8200 4010

3DMark

2%
Snapdragon 680
Stability 99%

Graphics test 2 FPS
N/A
Dimensity 8200
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 90 Hz 120Hz WQHD+ / 180Hz Full HD+ display support
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR10+ Adaptive support
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

82%
Turbo Clock Speed

3100 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)
    4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)
     1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8-A -
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - 4 MB
  • Process 6 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 610 Mali-G610 MC6
  • Architecture Adreno 610 Valhall 2
  • GPU frequency 1114 MHz -
  • Execution units 2 6
  • Shading units 96 -
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.2
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 6400 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB -
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 MediaTek APU 580(Multi-Core)
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X11 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 21
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6E
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
CPU
16%
GPU
10%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Mediatek Dimensity 8200

Mediatek Dimensity 8200
CPU
43%
GPU
40%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote