Overview - Snapdragon 680 Vs Exynos 2400

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 680 vs Exynos 2400 SoCs by Qualcomm and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 10-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 680 13
Exynos 2400 72
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 680 8
Exynos 2400 60
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 680 79
Exynos 2400 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 680 33
Exynos 2400 73
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 680 Exynos 2400
CPU 81097 510545
GPU 38425 587630
Memory 68438 322132
UX 63600 260123
Total score 251560 1680430
Key Differences

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 680

  • Snapdragon 680 has 10.41% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 2400 (1114 vs 1009 MHz).

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400

  • Exynos 2400 has 33.75% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 680 (3210 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 96.91% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 680 (4200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 680 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Exynos 2400 has 568.00% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 680 (1,680 K vs 252 K ).
  • Exynos 2400 has latest instruction set, hence better than Snapdragon 680.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 680 368
Exynos 2400 2193

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 680 1496
Exynos 2400 6895

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 2 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 90 Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

59%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

79%
Turbo Clock Speed

3210 MHz

44%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)
    4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)
    1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
    2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A520
  • Cores 8 10
  • Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 610 Samsung Xclipse 940
  • Architecture Adreno 610 Samsung Xclipse
  • GPU frequency 1114 MHz 1009 MHz
  • Execution units 2 -
  • Shading units 96 -
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 4200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 8 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2400
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X11 Exynos 5300
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support No Yes
  • 5G Download Speed - 9640 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed 390 Mbps -
  • 5G Upload Speed - 2550 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed 150 Mbps -
  • Wi-Fi 5 7
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680

CPU
13%
GPU
8%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Samsung Exynos 2400

CPU
72%
GPU
60%
Memory
49%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote